Domesticating Radical Rant and Rage: An Exploration of the Consequences of Environmental Shareholder Resolutions on Corporate Environmental Performance

• Published in: Business & society Vol. 50; no. 1; pp. 155 - 188
• Main Authors: Lee, Min-Dong Paul, Lounsbury, Michael
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Los Angeles, CA SAGE Publications 01-03-2011; SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC
• Subjects: Activism; Business; Consumers; Corporations; Demand; Disruption; End users; Environmental management; Management; Marketing; Movement; Pollution; Pollution abatement; Pollution control; Radicals; Resource Management; Shareholder activism; Social activism; Social Behavior; Social Movements; Social responsibility; Stock Markets; Stockholders; Studies; corporate social behavior; shareholder resolutions; social movements; social shareholder activism; corporate environmental performance
• ISSN: 0007-6503; 1552-4205
• DOI: 10.1177/0007650310394640

This article examines the effect of social shareholder activism on one of the most visible aspects of corporate social behavior, namely corporate pollution management practice. Social shareholder activism is a distinct form of social movement that engages firms “in the suites.” We theorize the effect of social shareholder activism using three social movement mechanisms: (a) disruption of routines, (b) reframing of issues using extant institutional logics, and (c) mobilization of relevant third-party constituents. Our empirical analysis using 13-year panel data of 58 public corporations strongly confirm the positive effect of environmental shareholder resolutions on the targeted firm’s pollution management practice. We have also found that certain firms targeted by social shareholder activism are more likely to respond positively to the demands than others. In particular, firms that can potentially incur higher disruption costs and are more dependent on reputation for critical resources such as larger firms as well as firms in industries that are closer to end-user consumers are more likely to concede to the demands from shareholder activists.