Adding Concurrent Chemotherapy to Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy Does Not Improve Treatment Outcomes for Stage II Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Phase 2 Multicenter Clinical Trial
Purpose: To explore the efficacy of concomitant chemotherapy in intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) to treat stage II nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Methods and Materials: In this randomized phase 2 study [registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01187238)], eligible patients with stage II (2010...
Saved in:
Published in: | Frontiers in oncology Vol. 10; p. 1314 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A
07-08-2020
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Purpose:
To explore the efficacy of concomitant chemotherapy in intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) to treat stage II nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC).
Methods and Materials:
In this randomized phase 2 study [registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01187238)], eligible patients with stage II (2010 UICC/AJCC) NPC were randomly assigned to either IMRT alone (RT group) or IMRT combined with concurrent cisplatin (40 mg/m
2
, weekly) (CCRT group). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). The second endpoints included local failure-free survival (LFFS), regional failure-free survival (RFFS), disease-free survival (DFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and acute toxicities.
Results:
Between May 2010 to July 2012, 84 patients who met the criteria were randomized to the RT group (
n
= 43) or the CCRT group (
n
= 41). The median follow-up time was 75 months. The OS, LFFS, RFFS, DFS, and DMFS for the RT group and CCRT group were 100% vs. 94.0% (
p
= 0.25), 93.0% vs. 89.3% (
p
= 0.79), 97.7% vs. 95.1% (
p
= 0.54), 90.4% vs. 86.6% (
p
= 0.72), and 95.2% vs. 94.5% (
p
= 0.77), respectively. A total of 14 patients experienced disease failure, 7 patients in each group. The incidence of grade 2 to 4 leukopenia was higher in the CCRT group (
p
= 0.022). No significant differences in liver, renal, skin, or mucosal toxicity was observed between the two groups.
Conclusion:
For patients with stage II NPC, concomitant chemotherapy with IMRT did not improve survival or disease control but had a detrimental effect on bone marrow function. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 Reviewed by: Nianyong Chen, Sichuan University, China; Liangfang Shen, Central South University, China This article was submitted to Head and Neck Cancer, a section of the journal Frontiers in Oncology Edited by: Jun Ma, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center (SYSUCC), China |
ISSN: | 2234-943X 2234-943X |
DOI: | 10.3389/fonc.2020.01314 |