Go With the Flow or Fight the Power? The Interactive Effects of Social Dominance Orientation and Perceived Injustice on Support for the Status Quo

Previous research in social dominance theory has found an asymmetry in the relationship between social dominance orientation (SDO) and various hierarchy-enhancing ideologies, such that the relationship between the two variables is significantly more positive among high-status group members than amon...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Political psychology Vol. 20; no. 1; pp. 1 - 14
Main Author: Rabinowitz, Joshua L.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Boston, USA and Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishers Inc 01-03-1999
Blackwell Publishing
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Previous research in social dominance theory has found an asymmetry in the relationship between social dominance orientation (SDO) and various hierarchy-enhancing ideologies, such that the relationship between the two variables is significantly more positive among high-status group members than among low-status group members (Sidanius, Pratto, & Rabinowitz, 1994; Sidanius, Levin, & Pratto, 1996). Perceptions of systemic injustice toward one's ingroup may help to explain this ideological asymmetry. The hypothesis of a three-way interaction among group status, SDO, and perceived injustice was tested by using survey responses from American university students to predict opposition to hierarchy-attenuating policies as well as levels of patriotism. Analyses revealed the presence of a three-way interaction (ps < .05). Ethnic minority students who scored high on SDO did not always maintain conservative policy stances or strong patriotic attachments-it depends on their level of perceived injustice. Implications for social dominance theory and system-justification theory are discussed.
Bibliography:istex:CC82EC34C2B212E51473E32C30528256D90F1E37
ark:/67375/WNG-FPG7DBVV-3
ArticleID:POPS135
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ISSN:0162-895X
1467-9221
DOI:10.1111/0162-895X.00135