Echo-sounding can discriminate between fish and macroinvertebrates in fresh water

1. Acoustic scattering from fish and macroinvertebrates was studied in a boreal Finnish lake at three echosounder frequencies (38, 120 and 200 kHz). Split-beam transducers with partly overlapping 7° beams were employed. Acoustic, fish and invertebrate sampling were undertaken simultaneously. Vertica...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Freshwater biology Vol. 53; no. 5; pp. 912 - 923
Main Authors: JURVELIUS, JUHA, KNUDSEN, FRANK REIER, BALK, HELGE, MARJOMÄKI, TIMO J, PELTONEN, HEIKKI, TASKINEN, JOUNI, TUOMAALA, ANTTI, VILJANEN, MARKKU
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Oxford, UK Oxford, UK : Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01-05-2008
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Blackwell Science
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:1. Acoustic scattering from fish and macroinvertebrates was studied in a boreal Finnish lake at three echosounder frequencies (38, 120 and 200 kHz). Split-beam transducers with partly overlapping 7° beams were employed. Acoustic, fish and invertebrate sampling were undertaken simultaneously. Vertical gradients of temperature and oxygen concentration were measured during the exercise. 2. At all frequencies, a narrow scattering layer coincided with the thermocline. At 38 kHz, fish were detected well with practically no reverberation from invertebrates while 200 kHz detected both fish and invertebrates. 3. Minor differences in the magnitude of acoustic scattering from fish were found between frequencies and between depth layers, but scattering at different frequencies was correlated at all depths. Acoustic scattering and fish density indices from trawl catches, consisting mostly of smelt (Osmerus eperlanus) (97%) and vendace (Coregonus albula) (3%), were significantly correlated. 4. Acoustic scattering from invertebrates increased with sound frequency. Correlation analysis suggested that the invertebrate scattering was mostly induced by Chaoborus flavicans. A low frequency is recommended for estimating fish abundance without bias from reverberation induced by invertebrate scattering. Although fish and invertebrates can also be successfully discriminated at a single frequency by thresholding and cross filtering, the combination of a low and a high frequency is a more robust tool for effective fish-invertebrate discrimination.
Bibliography:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2007.01944.x
ark:/67375/WNG-0GT9CFCD-P
ArticleID:FWB1944
istex:D68015CB40FBA9F21D209FA9CD767949E371EDB9
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0046-5070
1365-2427
DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2427.2007.01944.x