Characterizing Vaping Industry Political Influence and Mobilization on Facebook: Social Network Analysis

• Published in: Journal of medical Internet research Vol. 23; no. 10; p. e28069
• Main Authors: Haupt, Michael Robert, Xu, Qing, Yang, Joshua, Cai, Mingxiang, Mackey, Tim K
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Toronto Gunther Eysenbach MD MPH, Associate Professor 29-10-2021; JMIR Publications
• Subjects: Advocacy; Alternatives; Electronic cigarettes; Mass media; Mobilization; Networking; Original Paper; Political action; Political power; Public opinion; Social media; Social network analysis; Social networks; Tobacco; Tobacco industry; Trade associations; Vaping; United States > US; California
• ISSN: 1438-8871; 1439-4456; 1438-8871
• DOI: 10.2196/28069

Background
In response to recent policy efforts to regulate tobacco and vaping products, the vaping industry has been aggressive in mobilizing opposition by using a network of manufacturers, trade associations, and tobacco user communities, and by appealing to the general public. One strategy the alternative tobacco industry uses to mobilize political action is coordinating on social media platforms, such as the social networking site Facebook. However, few studies have specifically assessed how platforms such as Facebook are used to influence public sentiment and attitudes towards tobacco control policy.
Objective
This study used social network analysis to examine how the alternative tobacco industry uses Facebook to mobilize online users to influence tobacco control policy outcomes with a focus on the state of California.
Methods
Data were collected from local and national alternative tobacco Facebook groups that had affiliations with activities in the state of California. Network ties were constructed based on users’ reactions to posts (eg, “like” and “love”) and comments to characterize political mobilization networks.
Results
Findings show that alternative tobacco industry employees were more likely to engage within these networks and that these employees were also more likely to be influential members (ie, be more active) in the network. Comparisons between subnetworks show that communication within the local alternative tobacco advocacy group network was less dense and more centralized in contrast to a national advocacy group that had overall higher levels of engagement among members. A timeline analysis found that a higher number of influential posts that disseminated widely across networks occurred during e-cigarette–related legislative events, suggesting strategic online engagement and increased mobilization of online activity for the purposes of influencing policy outcomes.
Conclusions
Results from this study provide important insights into how tobacco industry–related advocacy groups leverage the Facebook platform to mobilize their online constituents in an effort to influence public perceptions and coordinate to defeat tobacco control efforts at the local, state, and federal level. Study results reveal one part of a vast network of socially enabled alternative tobacco industry actors and constituents that use Facebook as a mobilization point to support goals of the alternative tobacco industry.