End-of-life decision-making in critically ill old patients with and without coronavirus disease 2019

• Published in: Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica Vol. 68; no. 1; pp. 63 - 70
• Main Authors: Syrous, Alma Nordenskjöld, Gudnadottir, Gudny, Oras, Jonatan, Ferguson, Thalia, Lilja, David, Odenstedt Herges, Helena, Larsson, Emma, Block, Linda
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01-01-2024
• Subjects: Age; Anestesi och intensivvård; Anesthesiology and Intensive Care; Body mass; Body mass index; Body size; Comorbidity; Confidence intervals; Coronaviruses; COVID-19; COVID-19 - therapy; critical care; Critical Illness - therapy; Death; Decision analysis; Decision making; end-of-life decisions; Humans; intensive care; Intensive Care Units; life-sustaining treatment; Mechanical ventilation; Medicin och hälsovetenskap; Patients; Pilot Projects; Statistical analysis; Withholding Treatment; COVID-19; critical care; intensive care; end-of-life decisions; life-sustaining treatment
• ISSN: 0001-5172; 1399-6576; 1399-6576
• DOI: 10.1111/aas.14326

There are few studies on the differences in end-of-life decisions making in critically ill patients with and without coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). This study aimed to investigate the independent factors that predicted the decision to withdraw or withhold life-sustaining treatments (LST) in critically ill patients and if these decisions were based on different variables for critically ill patients with COVID-19 compared to those for critically ill patients with other diagnoses in a Swedish intensive care unit.
This observational pilot study was performed at Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden. Patients ≥65 years were included from 1 March 2020 to 30 April 2021. The association between a decision to limit LST and a priori selected variables including sex, age, Simplified Acute Physiology Score 3 (SAPS 3), Clinical Frailty Scale ≥4, Charlson Comorbidity Index, Body Mass Index, living at home, invasive and non-invasive mechanical ventilation was assessed using a univariate and multivariable logistic regression model and presented as odds ratio with corresponding 95% confidence intervals.
There were 394 patients included in this study, 131 in the non-COVID-19 group and 263 in the COVID-19 group. For the non-COVID-19 cohort, the univariate analysis demonstrated that age and SAPS 3 were significantly associated with the decision to withdraw or withhold life-sustaining treatments, and this association remained in the multivariable analysis, with odds ratios of 1.10 (1.03-1.19) p = .009 and 1.06 (1.03-1.10) p < .001, respectively. For the COVID-19 cohort, the univariate analysis indicated that age, SAPS 3, and Charlson comorbidity index were significantly associated with the decision to withdraw or withhold life-sustaining treatments. However, in multivariable analysis, only the Charlson comorbidity index remained independently associated with the decision to withdraw or withhold life-sustaining treatments, with an odds ratio of 1.26 (1.07-1.49), p = .006.
Decisions to withdraw or withhold life-sustaining treatments were based on other variables for the critically ill COVID-19 cohort compared to those for the critically ill non-COVID-19 cohort. Further studies are warranted to forge a common path for ethical end-of-life decision-making in critically ill patients.