Applicability, Tolerability and Efficacy of Preemptive Antiviral Therapy in Hepatitis C‐Infected Patients Undergoing Liver Transplantation

• Published in: American journal of transplantation Vol. 5; no. 1; pp. 118 - 124
• Main Authors: Shergill, Amandeep K., Khalili, Mandana, Straley, Stephanie, Bollinger, Kathy, Roberts, John P., Ascher, Nancy A., Terrault, Norah A.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Oxford, UK Munksgaard International Publishers 01-01-2005
• Subjects: Adult; Aged; Antiviral Agents - pharmacology; Antiviral Agents - therapeutic use; Biopsy; Erythropoietin - metabolism; Female; Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor - metabolism; Growth Substances - metabolism; Hepatitis C; Hepatitis C - etiology; Humans; Immunocompromised Host; Immunosuppressive Agents - pharmacology; interferon; Interferon alpha-2; Interferon-alpha - metabolism; Interferon-alpha - therapeutic use; Interferons - therapeutic use; Liver - pathology; Liver Diseases - etiology; liver transplantation; Liver Transplantation - adverse effects; Liver Transplantation - methods; Male; Middle Aged; Mycophenolic Acid - analogs & derivatives; Mycophenolic Acid - pharmacology; Polyethylene Glycols; Prednisone - pharmacology; preemptive; Recombinant Proteins; ribavirin; Ribavirin - pharmacology; Tacrolimus - pharmacology; Time Factors
• ISSN: 1600-6135; 1600-6143
• DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2004.00648.x

Preliminary studies suggest preemptive anti‐HCV therapy in liver transplant recipients may enhance the rates of viral clearance, but the applicability and tolerability of preemptive therapy has not been evaluated in a contemporary cohort. In this randomized study, the safety and tolerability of preemptive standard (IFN) or pegylated (peg‐IFN) interferon alfa‐2b (3 MU thrice weekly or 1.5 μg/kg weekly), or IFN/peg‐IFN plus ribavirin (600 mg increased to 1.0–1.2 g daily) was initiated 2–6 weeks post‐transplantation and continued for a total of 48 weeks. Only 51 (41%) of 124 transplant recipients were eligible for preemptive treatment; eligible patients had lower model for end‐stage liver disease (MELD) and Childs‐Pugh scores pre‐transplantation and were more frequently live donor transplant recipients than ineligible patients. Dose reductions and discontinuations were required in 85% and 37% of patients, respectively, and 27% experienced serious adverse events. Growth factor (GF) use (erythropoietin and GCSF) in the latter half of the study did not significantly affect the frequency of dose reductions. Only 15% of patients were able to achieve full‐dose treatment during treatment. End‐of‐treatment and sustained virological responses were 13.6% and 9.1%, respectively, with most responders in the combination therapy group. We conclude that preemptive antiviral therapy is applicable to only a portion of transplant recipients, with ‘sicker’ patients less likely to be managed by this approach. Living donor liver transplant recipients were more frequently eligible for treatment than deceased donor recipients. Virological response rates are low, likely related to the poor tolerability of therapy and the lack of achievement of target drug doses. Future studies should focus on alternative dosing schedules with more aggressive use of adjuvant therapies, including GFs.