Electronic evidence and its authenticity in forensic evidence

• Published in: Egyptian journal of forensic sciences Vol. 11; no. 1; pp. 1 - 10
• Main Author: Moussa, Ahmad Fekry
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Berlin/Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg 27-08-2021; Springer Nature B.V; SpringerOpen
• Subjects: Authentic electronic evidence; Authenticity; Computer technology and Internet crimes; Criminal evidence; Criminal judge; Cybercrime; Digital evidence; Discovery rule; Evidence; Forensic Medicine; Forensic sciences; International agreements; Legitimacy of electronic evidence; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Original Article; Pathology; Trials; Authentic electronic evidence; Criminal judge; Criminal evidence; Digital evidence; Legitimacy of electronic evidence; Computer technology and Internet crimes
• ISSN: 2090-5939; 2090-536X; 2090-5939
• DOI: 10.1186/s41935-021-00234-6

Background
The basis for criminal trials is the judge’s conviction of the evidence presented in a case. His belief is based on the context or evidence he is satisfactory with and understands. However, the law may establish certain evidence for the judge to adhere to. This study aims to identify the extent of the authenticity and strength of digital or electronic evidence in criminal trials, by identifying legislative trends in the various legal systems, and examining what legal jurists have done to determine the extent of the authenticity of the electronic evidence of cybercrimes.
Results
This study will research the legitimacy of electronic evidence and the conditions for its verification, the extent of the authenticity of electronic evidence found during an investigation, the difficulties of obtaining electronic evidence that can be presented before the courts, and the extent of a presiding judge’s freedom to determine if electronic materials presented in court should be used as evidence.
Conclusions
Two conditions must be met: first, the electronic evidence must be legally obtained based on written permission from the competent investigation authorities; second, it must be verified as valid by computer science and information technology experts. If those two conditions are not met, the evidence is invalid.
The study gives reason to talk about the need for the adoption of international agreements on cooperation in the development and exchange of computer and information technologies, aimed at preserving electronic evidence from destruction and oblige countries to implement and comply with these agreements.