Evaluating Two Common Strategies for Research Participant Recruitment Into Autism Studies: Observational Study

• Published in: Journal of medical Internet research Vol. 22; no. 9; p. e16752
• Main Authors: Ahmed, Kelli L, Simon, Andrea R, Dempsey, Jack R, Samaco, Rodney C, Goin-Kochel, Robin P
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Canada JMIR Publications 24-09-2020
• Subjects: Adult; Autism Spectrum Disorder - therapy; Female; Humans; Longitudinal Studies; Male; Middle Aged; Original Paper; Research Design; Young Adult; autism spectrum disorder; Facebook; social media; genetic studies; participant recruitment; radio
• ISSN: 1438-8871; 1439-4456; 1438-8871
• DOI: 10.2196/16752

Ongoing research is necessary to better understand the causes of autism spectrum disorder (ASD), the developmental outcomes for individuals diagnosed with ASD, and the efficacy of the interventions. However, it is often difficult to recruit sufficient numbers of participants for studies, and despite the prevalence of ASD (currently estimated to affect 1 in 54 children), little research has focused on how to efficiently recruit participants with ASD.
The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy of two different paid advertisements-social media and radio advertising-in recruiting participants for a study enrolling people with ASD and their family members by examining the number of participants enrolled, the cost per participant, and the geographic reach of each type of advertising.
We examined participant enrollment in a study following nonoverlapping paid advertisements on a popular FM radio station (aired in three cities across two states) and Facebook (six advertisements that ran in five cities across two states). The total paid investment in the radio campaign was $12,030 and that in the Facebook campaign was $2950. Following the advertising campaigns, 1391 participants in the study who were affiliated with the Houston, Texas, site received email invitations to participate in a brief survey about the ways in which they learned about the study (eg, social media, medical provider, website) and which of these were most influential in their decisions to participate; 374 (26.8%) of the participants completed this survey.
Social media advertising outperformed radio in all three parameters examined by enrolling more participants (338 vs 149), with a lower average cost per participant ($8.73 vs $80.74) and a wider geographic reach, based on a comparison of the number of zip codes within and outside of Texas for questionnaire respondents who rated social media as the most influential method of contact (n=367, χ
=5.85, P=.02). Of the 374 survey participants, 139 (37.2%) reported that they had seen the study on social media prior to enrollment, while only 9 (2.4%) said they heard about it via radio.
Our findings suggest that advertising on social media can efficiently reach a large pool of potential participants with ASD, increasing the likelihood of meeting study enrollment goals. Researchers should consider allocating at least some portion of recruitment dollars to social media platforms as a means of quickly and inexpensively reaching out to their target populations, including for studies with in-person procedures.