UK policy coordination: the importance of institutional design

This paper considers the principles that underpin the design of the UK's macroeconomic framework, with particular emphasis on the importance of good institutional design in ensuring effective coordination of monetary and fiscal policy when an independent Bank of England Monetary Policy Committe...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Fiscal studies Vol. 23; no. 1; pp. 135 - 164
Main Authors: Bhundia, Ashok, O'Donnell, Gus
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: London, UK The Institute for Fiscal Studies 01-03-2002
Institute for Fiscal Studies
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This paper considers the principles that underpin the design of the UK's macroeconomic framework, with particular emphasis on the importance of good institutional design in ensuring effective coordination of monetary and fiscal policy when an independent Bank of England Monetary Policy Committee has operational responsibility for setting interest rates. The theoretical literature on policy coordination finds that the cost of central bank independence is less monetary–fiscal coordination. We argue that once account is taken of the institutional arrangements, this conclusion does not hold for the UK. In fact, the UK macroeconomic policy framework represents a significant improvement in policy coordination through mechanisms that allow for greater transparency and accountability in policy-making. Among the measures discussed in the paper is the role of the Treasury Representative on the Bank of England Monetary Policy Committee.
Bibliography:ArticleID:FISC135
ark:/67375/WNG-FS6SMP7C-M
istex:9705A1E9449DCE254E1741ADE5C072ADC200C574
This paper was given as the 2001 IFS Annual Lecture. The authors are grateful to members of the Bank of England's Monetary Policy Committee and HM Treasury who provided comments on an earlier draft. The views expressed do not necessarily reflect those of the IMF.
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0143-5671
1475-5890
DOI:10.1111/j.1475-5890.2002.tb00057.x