Hydrologic reinforcement induced by contrasting woody species during summer and winter

• Published in: Plant and soil Vol. 427; no. 1/2; pp. 369 - 390
• Main Authors: Boldrin, D., Leung, A. K., Bengough, A. G.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Cham Springer 01-06-2018; Springer International Publishing; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Biomedical and Life Sciences; Columns (structural); Ecology; Environmental aspects; Evapotranspiration; Growth rate; Hydrology; Life Sciences; Matric suction; Moisture content; Plant Physiology; Plant Sciences; Plant-soil relationships; Regular Article; Reinforcement; Slope stability; Slopes (Landforms); Soil columns; Soil profiles; Soil properties; Soil Science & Conservation; Soil strength; Soil suction; Soil water; Species; Summer; Transpiration; Ulex europaeus; Water content; Wetting; Winter; Transpiration; Evergreens; Matric suction; Eco-engineering; Hydrologic reinforcement
• ISSN: 0032-079X; 1573-5036
• DOI: 10.1007/s11104-018-3640-7

Aims Vegetation can improve slope stability by transpiration-induced suction (hydrologie reinforcement). However, hydrologie reinforcement varies with seasons, especially under temperate climates. This study aims to quantify and compare the hydrologie reinforcement provided by contrasting species during winter and summer. Methods One deciduous (Corylus avellana) and two evergreens (Ilex aquifolium and Ulex europaeus) were planted in 1-m soil columns. Soil columns were irrigated, left for evapotranspiration and then subjected to extreme wetting events during both summer and winter. Soil water content, matric suction and strength were measured down the soil profile. Plant water status and growth (above- and below-ground) were also recorded. Results The tested species showed differing abilities to remove water, induce suction and hence influence soil strength. During summer, only Ulex europaeus provided a soil strength gain (up to six-fold the value at saturation) along the entire depth-profile inducing high suction (e.g. 70 kPa), largely maintained after wetting events in deeper soil (0.7 m). During winter, the evergreen species could remove water but at slower rates compared to summer. Conclusions Evergreens could slowly induce suction and hence potentially stabilise slopes during winter. However, there were large differences between the two evergreens because of different growth rate and resource use.