Selective renal vasoconstriction, exaggerated natriuresis and excretion rates of exosomic proteins in essential hypertension
Aim In essential hypertension (EH), the regulation of renal sodium excretion is aberrant. We hypothesized that in mild EH, (i) abnormal dynamics of plasma renin concentration (PRC) and atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) are responsible for the exaggerated natriuresis, and (ii) exosomic protein pattern...
Saved in:
Published in: | Acta Physiologica Vol. 212; no. 1; pp. 106 - 118 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
England
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
01-09-2014
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Aim
In essential hypertension (EH), the regulation of renal sodium excretion is aberrant. We hypothesized that in mild EH, (i) abnormal dynamics of plasma renin concentration (PRC) and atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) are responsible for the exaggerated natriuresis, and (ii) exosomic protein patterns reflect the renal tubular abnormality involved in the dysregulation of sodium excretion.
Methods
After 2‐week drug washout and 4‐day diet, systemic and renal hemodynamics, cardio‐renal hormones, glomerular filtration and renal excretion were studied in male patients during saline loading (SL). Excretion rates of exosome‐related urinary proteins including apical membrane transporters were determined by proteomics‐based methods.
Results
In patients, baseline renal vascular conductance was reduced (−44%, P < 0.001), but non‐renal vascular conductances were normal while PRC was reduced and ANP elevated (both P < 0.01). SL induced exaggerated natriuresis and reduced PRC (P < 0.01), at normal suppression rate. SL increased arterial pressure in patients (+11 mmHg, P < 0.001), but not in controls; however, during time control, patients showed identical increases (+10 mmHg, P < 0.005) apparently dissociating arterial pressure from natriuresis.
At baseline, excretion rates of 438 proteins ranged from 0.07 to 49.8 pmol (mmol creatinine)−1; 12 proteins were found in all subjects, and 21 proteins were found in two or more patients, but not in controls. In patients, the excretion rate of retinoic acid‐induced gene 2 protein was reduced, and excretion rates of other proteins showed increased variances compatible with pathophysiological and clinical applicability.
Conclusion
Essential hypertension patients exhibit selective renal vasoconstriction and individually varying excretion rates of several exosome‐related proteins. Hormonal changes, rather than arterial pressure, seem to cause exaggeration of natriuresis. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | Danish Cardiovascular Research Academy (DaCRA) University of Southern Denmark (SDU) istex:3B9B8178211D193D4EA8696996E2434C5A62CF65 ArticleID:APHA12345 Figure S1. Hemodynamics, plasma hormones and renal sodium excretion in hypertensive patients during time control (blue) and saline infusion (Na-load in red).Figure S2. Changes in excretion rates of V-ATPase subunits with saline loading in three control subjects (panel a) and five hypertensive patients (panel b).Data S1. Methods. Table S1. Entry characteristics of hypertensive patients (EH) and control subjects (CON). Table S2. Exosomic proteins detected in baseline samples and ranked according to abundance. Table S3. Exosomic proteins present in all baseline samples ranked according to abundance in control subjects. Table S4. Exosomic proteins present in all baseline samples of normal subjects, but not all patients. Table S5. Exosomic proteins occurring in baseline urine samples from at least 2 patients, but not from any control subjects. Table S6. Excretion rates of exosomic V-ATPase subunits in hypertensives and control subjects, at baseline and after saline loading. Table S7. Proteins identified in baseline sample from one hypertensive patient, but not in any control subject.Table S8. Raw peptide and protein data.Table S9. Excretion rates (pmol mmol−1 creatinine) with standard deviation and coefficient of variation (CV) for controls (C) and patients (P) after n ≥ 2 filtering of technical replicates and normalization of determined absolute protein amounts by measured creatine levels.Table S10. Excretion rates (pmol mmol−1 creatinine) for proteins identified in ≥2 replicate runs for individual controls (C) and patients (P), before and after saline loading, as well as per group (mean ± SEM). Annie and Otto Detlefs' Foundation Lisa and Gudmund Jørgensens Foundation SDU Center for Clinical Proteomics Faculty of Health Sciences ark:/67375/WNG-28KQ6DM1-2 ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 1748-1708 1748-1716 |
DOI: | 10.1111/apha.12345 |