Employee perceptions of corporate social responsibility: Effects on pride, embeddedness, and turnover

We examined socioemotional microfoundations of perceived corporate social responsibility (CSR) and posited that employees’ perceived CSR triggers a perception‐emotion‐attitude‐behavior sequence. Drawing from appraisal theory of emotion, we hypothesized that perceived CSR relates to emotions (i.e., o...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Personnel psychology Vol. 72; no. 1; pp. 107 - 137
Main Authors: Ng, Thomas W. H., Yam, Kai Chi, Aguinis, Herman
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Durham Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01-03-2019
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:We examined socioemotional microfoundations of perceived corporate social responsibility (CSR) and posited that employees’ perceived CSR triggers a perception‐emotion‐attitude‐behavior sequence. Drawing from appraisal theory of emotion, we hypothesized that perceived CSR relates to emotions (i.e., organizational pride), which relate to job attitudes (i.e., organizational embeddedness) that in turn relate to job behaviors (i.e., decreased turnover). To test this model, we conducted a multistudy investigation involving different samples, designs, and data‐analytic methods. In Study 1, we conducted an experiment and found that participants who envisioned working in a firm that was active regarding CSR activities reported greater pride and organizational embeddedness. We then conducted two field studies using a nonmanagerial sample (Study 2) and a managerial sample (Study 3) and found that participants’ perceived CSR was positively related to their pride, which in turn was related to stronger organizational embeddedness. Stronger organizational embeddedness was related to lower turnover 6 months later in Study 2 but not in Study 3. In Study 4, we conducted a longitudinal four‐wave 14‐month study to test the proposed relationships from a within‐person conceptualization, and the results were also supportive. Thus, the proposed perception‐emotion‐attitude‐behavior framework received broad support and illustrated that stronger microfoundations of CSR research could be constructed through understanding employees’ emotional, attitudinal, and behavioral reactions to their perceptions of their employers’ CSR.
Bibliography:anonymous reviewers for highly constructive feedback that allowed us to improve our manuscript in a substantial manner.
Funding information
This research was funded by Hong Kong General Research Fund (GRF 17506316) awarded to Thomas W. H. Ng.
Personnel Psychology
We thank James M. Diefendorff and two
ISSN:0031-5826
1744-6570
DOI:10.1111/peps.12294