Assessing the effectiveness of policies in sustaining and promoting ecosystem services in the Indian Himalayas

• Published in: International journal of biodiversity science, ecosystems services & management Vol. 11; no. 3; pp. 216 - 224
• Main Authors: Badola, Ruchi, Hussain, Syed Ainul, Dobriyal, Pariva, Barthwal, Shivani
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Taylor & Francis 03-07-2015
• Subjects: biodiversity; climate change; community service; ecosystem services; ecosystems; forests; globalization; governance; Indian Himalayas; issues and policy; markets; mixed governance approach; policy instruments; stakeholders; wildlife; Pakistan, Himalayas
• ISSN: 2151-3740; 2151-3732; 2151-3740
• DOI: 10.1080/21513732.2015.1030694

We examined existing policy instruments of the Indian forest, wildlife, and environment sectors for the period 1927–2008 to (a) assess their strengths and weaknesses in addressing information, market and policy failures in ecosystem service provision in the Indian Himalayan region and (b) determine if they were informatory or regulatory in nature and whether they encouraged the use of market-based instruments. Our analysis revealed that Indian policy measures can be categorized into four eras: Production (1927–1972), Protection (1972–1988), Community Participation (1988–2006), and Climate Change and Globalization (2006 onwards). The policies of the earlier two eras were largely regulatory in nature. From 1988 onwards, community participation in biodiversity conservation has made the policies more informatory and market-based. The recognition that Himalayas are a distinct ecosystem, crucial for their services but vulnerable to climate change impacts, has come about only with the National Mission on Sustaining Himalayan Ecosystem. Given the multiple stakeholders in Indian Himalayas and the off-site nature of ecosystem services, a complementarity of instruments and their ability to address the consequences of local decisions on downstream ecosystem services are essential. A participatory and sectorally coordinated mixed governance approach is needed to sustain ecosystem services in the region.