Meta-analysis of oncological outcomes after local excision of pT1-2 rectal cancer requiring adjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy or completion surgery

Background Completion total mesorectal excision (TME) is advised for high‐risk early (pT1/pT2) rectal cancer following transanal removal. The main objective of this meta‐analysis was to determine oncological outcomes of adjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy as a rectum‐preserving alternative to completion TM...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:British journal of surgery Vol. 103; no. 9; pp. 1105 - 1116
Main Authors: Borstlap, W. A. A., Coeymans, T. J., Tanis, P. J., Marijnen, C. A. M., Cunningham, C., Bemelman, W. A., Tuynman, J. B.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Chichester, UK John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 01-08-2016
Oxford University Press
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background Completion total mesorectal excision (TME) is advised for high‐risk early (pT1/pT2) rectal cancer following transanal removal. The main objective of this meta‐analysis was to determine oncological outcomes of adjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy as a rectum‐preserving alternative to completion TME. Methods A literature search using PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library was performed in February 2015. Studies had to include at least ten patients with pT1/pT2 adenocarcinomas that were removed transanally and followed by either adjuvant chemoradiotherapy or completion surgery. A weighted average of the logit proportions was determined for the pooled analyses of subgroups according to treatment modality and pT category. Results In total, 14 studies comprising 405 patients treated with adjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy and seven studies comprising 130 patients treated with completion TME were included. Owing to heterogeneity it was not possible to compare the two strategies directly. However, the weighted average local recurrence rate for locally excised pT1/pT2 rectal cancer treated with adjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy was 14 (95 per cent c.i. 11 to 18) per cent, and 7 (4 to 14) per cent following completion TME. The weighted averages for distance recurrence were 9 (6 to 14) and 9 (5 to 16) per cent respectively. Weighted averages for local recurrence rate after adjuvant chemo(radiotherapy) and completion TME for pT1 were 10 (4 to 21) and 6 (3 to 15) per cent respectively. Corresponding averages for pT2 were 15 (11 to 21) and 10 (4 to 22) per cent respectively. Conclusion A higher recurrence rate after transanal excision and adjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy must be balanced against the morbidity and mortality associated with mesorectal excision. A reasonable approach is close follow‐up and salvage mesorectal surgery as needed. Salvage surgery may be superior
Bibliography:Appendix S1 Search details Fig. S1 Quality assessment according to the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) checklist. 0, Not reported; 1, reported but inadequate; 2, reported but adequate Fig. S2 Graphical representation of the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) checklist Table S1 Baseline characteristics of studies on local excision and adjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy (Word document) Table S2 Baseline characteristics of studies on local excision and completion transanal excision (Word document)
istex:D0B791D0F2AAEAC739209DA0D5B631D5642E9740
ark:/67375/WNG-BT5NCS5P-C
ArticleID:BJS10163
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
ObjectType-Review-3
content type line 23
ISSN:0007-1323
1365-2168
DOI:10.1002/bjs.10163