Conformational study of some 4′-substituted 2-(phenylselanyl)-2-(ethylsulfonyl)-acetophenones

• Published in: Journal of molecular structure Vol. 1084; pp. 190 - 199
• Main Authors: Cerqueira, Carlos R., Olivato, Paulo R., Rodrigues, Daniel N.S., Zukerman-Schpector, Julio, Tiekink, Edward R.T., Dal Colle, Maurizio
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Elsevier B.V 15-03-2015
• Subjects: 4′-Substituted 2-(phenylselanyl)-2-(ethylsulfonyl)-acetophenones; Bonding; Carbonyls; Conformational analysis; Hydrogen bonds; Infrared radiation; Infrared spectroscopy; Mathematical models; Nitrogen dioxide; Orbitals; Solvent effect; Theoretical calculations; X-ray diffraction; X-rays; Solvent effect; X-ray diffraction; Infrared spectroscopy; Theoretical calculations; 4′-Substituted 2-(phenylselanyl)-2-(ethylsulfonyl)-acetophenones; Conformational analysis
• ISSN: 0022-2860; 1872-8014
• DOI: 10.1016/j.molstruc.2014.12.033

Most stable conformers (c1 and c2) in the gas phase and in solution for compounds 1–5. Y=NO2 (1), Br (2), H (3), Me (4), OMe (5). [Display omitted]
•Conformational analysis.•Solvent effect on the conformational equilibrium through IR spectrocopy.•Theoretical calculations in the gas-phase and in solvents (PCM).•Natural Bond Orbital (NBO) analysis.
The analysis of infrared (IR) carbonyl bands of some 4′-substituted 2-(phenylselanyl)-2-(ethylsulfonyl)-acetophenones 1–5 bearing substituents NO21, Br 2, H 3, Me 4 and OMe 5, supported by B3LYP/6–31+G(d,p) and single point polarizable continuum model calculations, along with natural bond orbital (NBO) analysis (for 1, 3, 5) and X-ray diffraction (for 4) was performed. Theoretical data indicated the existence of two stable conformations: c1 and c2. The former exhibits the highest νCO frequency and corresponds to the most stable (for 1–5) and to the most polar one (for 2–4). The sum of the energy contributions of selected orbital interactions (NBO analysis) of 1, 3 and 5 is quite similar for both conformers. Nevertheless, adding the LPO(CO)→σ∗CH[CH2(Et)] and LPO(SO2)→σ∗CH(oSePh) orbital interaction energies, the c1 conformer becomes significantly more stable than the c2 one. The occurrence of these hydrogen bonds plays an important role in determining the geometry of the c1 conformer. This geometry allows the oppositely charged Oδ−(CO)⋯Sδ+(SO2) and Oδ−(SO2)⋯Cδ+(CO) atoms of the carbonyl and sulfonyl groups to assume interatomic distances shorter than the sum of the van der Waals radii that stabilize the referred conformer. Likewise, this geometry favours the Oδ−(CO)⋯Oδ−(SO2) short contact and the consequent repulsive field effect that increases the νCO frequency of the c1 conformer to a greater extent with respect to that of the c2 one. Therefore, the more intense higher frequency carbonyl doublet component in the IR spectrum in solution can be ascribed to the c1 conformer and the less intense component at lower frequency to the c2 one. X-ray single crystal analysis of 4 indicates that this compound adopts the c1 geometry. The molecules in the solid are linked in centrosymmetrical pairs through C9H10⋯O36 hydrogen bond interaction along with the LPSe⋯πPh interaction.