Development and application of tools for incursion response: Lessons learned from the management of the fouling pest Didemnum vexillum

• Published in: Journal of experimental marine biology and ecology Vol. 342; no. 1; pp. 154 - 162
• Main Authors: Coutts, Ashley D.M., Forrest, Barrie M.
• Format: Journal Article Conference Proceeding
• Language: English
• Published: Amsterdam Elsevier B.V 26-03-2007; Elsevier Science
• Subjects: Animal and plant ecology; Animal, plant and microbial ecology; Anthropogenic spread; Biological and medical sciences; Didemnum vexillum; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology; Incursion response; Marine; Marine bioinvasion; New Zealand; Pest management; Salmonidae; Sea water ecosystems; Slow-moving vessels; Synecology; Vexillum; New Zealand; Oceania; PSE, New Zealand; Anthropogenic spread; New Zealand; Incursion response; Marine bioinvasion; Pest management; Didemnum vexillum; Slow-moving vessels; Marine environment; Pest; Anthropogenic factor
• ISSN: 0022-0981; 1879-1697
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jembe.2006.10.042

In October 2001, an unidentified didemnid ascidian, was recorded for the first time in New Zealand, smothering wharf piles and moorings in a northern harbour. A heavily-fouled barge then translocated the ascidian to an international shipping port some 500 km south, near the heart of the New Zealand mussel industry. The species was subsequently identified as
Didemnum vexillum, but its status as indigenous or non-indigenous was disputed. Nonetheless, its presence was regarded as a significant threat to the mussel industry because of its demonstrated invasiveness on artificial structures, and its ability to over-grow and smother mussels.
From the barge's mooring area,
D. vexillum subsequently spread to the seabed beneath, and to nearby vessels and artificial structures (i.e., barges, recreational vessels, moorings, salmon cages and wharf piles). Given the likelihood that infected vectors would spread the ascidian to mussel farms in the region, and in consideration of a benefit-cost analysis, an eradication program for
D. vexillum was instigated. This paper provides a chronology of events surrounding the initial detection and spread of the ascidian, and describes the development of incursion response tools for the different substrata that were infected. The treatments included smothering soft-sediment habitats with uncontaminated dredge spoil, wrapping wharf piles with plastic, smothering rip–rap habitats using a geotextile fabric, and various other approaches based on water blasting, air drying or chlorine dosing. While many of the response methods were completely effective at eliminating
D. vexillum from different substrata, the program overall failed to eradicate the organism from the region. The reasons for this failure are documented, and the important lessons learned are highlighted, as a contribution to the successful management of invasive species in the future.