Standardized multi-planar reformation improves the reliability of the assessment of the anterolateral ligament in ACL-deficient knees

• Published in: Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA Vol. 31; no. 9; pp. 3799 - 3805
• Main Authors: Hess, Silvan, Hecker, Andreas, Egli, Rainer J., Eberlein, Sophie C., Klenke, Frank M.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Berlin/Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg 01-09-2023; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Anterior cruciate ligament; Fractures; Integrity; Knee; Ligaments; Magnetic resonance imaging; Medical imaging; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Orthopedics; Quality assessment; Reliability analysis; Sports Medicine; Stability analysis; Knee; ALL; Multi-planar reformation; Sport; ACL; MRI
• ISSN: 0942-2056; 1433-7347
• DOI: 10.1007/s00167-023-07343-w

Purpose
The anterolateral ligament (ALL) is an important structure for controlling anterolateral rotatory stability of the knee. Its assessment, however, is difficult using standardized MRI images. The goal of this study was to assess the reliability of judging the integrity of the ALL on multi-planar reformatted (MPR) MRI images and on standard coronal reformatted (SCR) MRI images in knees with an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture.
Methods
Forty-eight patients (14 females, 34 males, 30 ± 6 years (mean age ± standard deviation)) with acute ACL ruptures (< 2 weeks) and no additional knee injuries (except segond fractures) were included. Images were assessed by two independent raters twice with at least a 2-week interval in between. The assessment was first performed on SCR images and thereafter on MPR images. Images were judged for assessability of the ALL and then the integrity of the ALL was rated.
Results
Depending on rater and read, the ALL was judged as “torn” in between 5 (10.4%) and 11 (22.9%) patients out of 48 patients on SCR images. On MRP images, the ALL was judged as “torn” in between 5 (10.4%) and 6 (12.5%) patients out of 48 patients, depending on rater and read. Inter- and intra-rater reliability for the assessment of the ALL using MPR images was “substantial” to “almost perfect”. Inter- and intra-rater reliability for the assessment using SCR was “fair” to “substantial”.
Conclusion
MPR images should be used when assessing the integrity of the ALL. Assessment quality is independent of patient positioning during MRI acquisition and the ALL can be displayed in full length on one image.
Level of evidence
Level III