A Controlled Evaluation of Assessments by Doctors and Nurses in a Magistrates' Court Mental Health Assessment and Diversion Scheme

In this study, assessments of prisoners by doctors and nurses were compared in a provincial magistrates' court mental health assessment and diversion scheme, and outcomes were compared with the outcomes of those for whom no assessments were available during a control period. Substance misuse wa...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Medicine, science, and the law Vol. 39; no. 1; pp. 38 - 48
Main Authors: Chambers, Clare, Rix, Keith J B
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: London, England SAGE Publications 01-01-1999
Sweet and Maxwell
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:In this study, assessments of prisoners by doctors and nurses were compared in a provincial magistrates' court mental health assessment and diversion scheme, and outcomes were compared with the outcomes of those for whom no assessments were available during a control period. Substance misuse was relatively common and psychosis uncommon in the prisoners referred. Assessment by doctors enabled magistrates to reduce remands in custody of persons suspected of suffering from mental disorder and to grant bail in more cases. Only a small proportion of prisoners were admitted to hospital and although doctors and nurses recommended outpatient treatment in many cases, the attendance rate was low. Doctors were more likely than nurses to identify prisoners with medical needs that needed to be brought to the attention of the prison health care service, and to recommend out-patient psychiatric treatment and identify relevant medicolegal issues. Prisoners assessed by nurses were less likely than those assessed by doctors to attend alcohol or drug treatment services if recommended to do so. Prisoners who were admitted to hospital after a remand in custody spent longer on remand if assessed by nurses compared with those assessed by doctors.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0025-8024
2042-1818
DOI:10.1177/002580249903900108