Assessing robustness of generalised estimating equations and quadratic inference functions
In the presence of data contamination or outliers, some empirical studies have indicated that the two methods of generalised estimating equations and quadratic inference functions appear to have rather different robustness behaviour. This paper presents a theoretical investigation from the perspecti...
Saved in:
Published in: | Biometrika Vol. 91; no. 2; pp. 447 - 459 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Oxford
Oxford University Press
01-06-2004
Biometrika Trust, University College London Oxford University Press for Biometrika Trust Oxford Publishing Limited (England) |
Series: | Biometrika |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | In the presence of data contamination or outliers, some empirical studies have indicated that the two methods of generalised estimating equations and quadratic inference functions appear to have rather different robustness behaviour. This paper presents a theoretical investigation from the perspective of the influence function to identify the causes for the difference. We show that quadratic inference functions lead to bounded influence functions and the corresponding M‐estimator has a redescending property, but the generalised estimating equation approach does not. We also illustrate that, unlike generalised estimating equations, quadratic inference functions can still provide consistent estimators even if part of the data is contaminated. We conclude that the quadratic inference function is a preferable method to the generalised estimating equation as far as robustness is concerned. This conclusion is supported by simulations and real‐data examples. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | istex:7D890A403A034BD69C017C6A82BB1074325174E6 local:910447 ark:/67375/HXZ-FNQJCR02-L June 2003. November 2003. |
ISSN: | 0006-3444 1464-3510 |
DOI: | 10.1093/biomet/91.2.447 |