Assessing robustness of generalised estimating equations and quadratic inference functions

In the presence of data contamination or outliers, some empirical studies have indicated that the two methods of generalised estimating equations and quadratic inference functions appear to have rather different robustness behaviour. This paper presents a theoretical investigation from the perspecti...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Biometrika Vol. 91; no. 2; pp. 447 - 459
Main Authors: Qu, Annie, Song, Peter X.‐K.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Oxford Oxford University Press 01-06-2004
Biometrika Trust, University College London
Oxford University Press for Biometrika Trust
Oxford Publishing Limited (England)
Series:Biometrika
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:In the presence of data contamination or outliers, some empirical studies have indicated that the two methods of generalised estimating equations and quadratic inference functions appear to have rather different robustness behaviour. This paper presents a theoretical investigation from the perspective of the influence function to identify the causes for the difference. We show that quadratic inference functions lead to bounded influence functions and the corresponding M‐estimator has a redescending property, but the generalised estimating equation approach does not. We also illustrate that, unlike generalised estimating equations, quadratic inference functions can still provide consistent estimators even if part of the data is contaminated. We conclude that the quadratic inference function is a preferable method to the generalised estimating equation as far as robustness is concerned. This conclusion is supported by simulations and real‐data examples.
Bibliography:istex:7D890A403A034BD69C017C6A82BB1074325174E6
local:910447
ark:/67375/HXZ-FNQJCR02-L
June 2003. November 2003.
ISSN:0006-3444
1464-3510
DOI:10.1093/biomet/91.2.447