The influence of Amylostereum areolatum diversity and competitive interactions on the fitness of the Sirex parasitic nematode Deladenus siricidicola

• Published in: Biological control Vol. 61; no. 3; pp. 207 - 214
• Main Authors: Hurley, B.P., Hatting, H.J., Wingfield, M.J., Klepzig, K.D., Slippers, B.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Elsevier Inc 01-06-2012
• Subjects: Amylostereum; Amylostereum areolatum; Biological control; biological control agents; Competition; Deladenus; Deladenus siricidicola; Diplodia pinea; feeds; industry; Nematoda; Noctilio; Ophiostoma; parasitism; prediction; reproductive performance; Sapstain fungi; Sirex; Sirex noctilio; trees; water potential; Competition; Sirex noctilio; Sapstain fungi; Biological control; Amylostereum areolatum; Deladenus siricidicola
• ISSN: 1049-9644; 1090-2112
• DOI: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2012.02.006

[Display omitted]
► We investigated factors influencing survival of the parasitic nematode Deladenus siricidicola. ► Different strains of Amylostereum areolatum did not influence survival of D. siricidicola. ► Sapstain fungi competed against A. areolatum, the food source of D. siricidicola. ► The sapstain fungus Diploida pinea competed more aggressively in low moisture conditions. ► These competitive interactions could negatively effect the survival of D. siricidicola.
The Sirex noctilio (woodwasp)–Amylostereum areolatum (fungus) complex has caused substantial losses to pine industries in its introduced range. The nematode Deladenus siricidicola that parasitizes S. noctilio and feeds on A. areolatum is widely used as a biological control agent for S. noctilio, but not with consistent success. This variable success could be due to factors that influence the feeding and reproductive ability of the nematode on A. areolatum. We test two main hypotheses that emerge from this prediction. First, we compared the survival of D. siricidicola on the South African field strain and the Australian laboratory strain of A. areolatum, to examine a possible incompatibility between nematode and fungal strain. Second, we examined the competitive interactions of these two A. areolatum strains with two common sapstain fungi, Diplodia pinea and Ophiostoma ips, that occur in S. noctilio infested trees in South Africa. The effect of water potential on the outcome of these fungal interactions was also considered. The data showed that D. siricidicola survives at comparable levels on the two A. areolatum strains. Water potential of the media significantly influenced growth of the fungi and their ability to capture host resource in competitive interactions. D. pinea competed increasingly better against A. areolatum with decreasing water potential. The results suggest that competitive interactions between A. areolatum and sapstain fungi could negatively influence the success of D. siricidicola, especially under conditions of lowered water potential.