International survey of ophthalmic anaesthesia service provision, protection of anaesthesia providers and patients during COVID-19 pandemic: a wake-up call

• Published in: Eye (London) Vol. 37; no. 3; pp. 548 - 553
• Main Authors: Vohra, Shashi B., Kumar, Chandra M.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: London Nature Publishing Group UK 01-02-2023; Nature Publishing Group
• Subjects: 692/1537; 692/700/228/491; Anesthesia; Communicable Disease Control; Coronaviruses; COVID-19; Humans; Intensive care units; Laboratory Medicine; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Ophthalmology; Pandemics; Pandemics - prevention & control; Pharmaceutical Sciences/Technology; SARS-CoV-2; Streaming; Surgery; Surgical Oncology; Surveys; Surveys and Questionnaires
• ISSN: 0950-222X; 1476-5454; 1476-5454
• DOI: 10.1038/s41433-022-01979-7

Aims
This international survey was conducted to study the impact of Covid-19 pandemic on the provision and practices of ophthalmic anaesthesia, evaluate the methods employed by parent ophthalmic units for safeguarding their anaesthesia providers and patients during lockdown, and to assess pandemic’s effect on anaesthesia providers as individuals. The study was done with the hope that the results will help in protecting patients and safeguarding precious human resource by better management if this pandemic was to continue or there was to be another pandemic.
Methods
An anonymous questionnaire survey was distributed electronically between December 2020–January 2021 to the practicing ophthalmic anaesthesia providers in different parts of the world.
Results
The survey identified that apart from reducing elective operating services, the ophthalmic units were ill prepared for the pandemic and the overall management was lacklustre. There was a definite lack of effective peri-operative patient screening, and, streaming processes. Measures for personal protection of staff were not optimal especially during regional/local ophthalmic anaesthesia. Severity of the pandemic, sudden job plan changes, and redeployment to intensive care units/acute covid wards had an adverse psychological impact on the affected staff.
Conclusion
Ophthalmic anaesthesia services worldwide have had poor attentiveness to the life-threatening menace and reality of Covid-19 pandemic. A review of the institutional practices to address correctible deficiencies is urgently required. Robust, mandatory, elective, timely preventative strategies need to be implemented to protect patients, and, the precious ophthalmic workforce from potential adverse physical and psychological injuries.