Is the laparoscopic approach a safe choice for the management of acute appendicitis in pregnant women? A meta-analysis of observational studies

• Published in: Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England Vol. 101; no. 4; pp. 235 - 248
• Main Authors: Frountzas, M, Nikolaou, C, Stergios, K, Kontzoglou, K, Toutouzas, K, Pergialiotis, V
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England BMJ Publishing Group LTD 01-04-2019; Royal College of Surgeons
• Subjects: Abdomen; Acute Disease; Age; Apgar score; Appendectomy; Appendicitis; Appendicitis - complications; Appendicitis - surgery; Female; General Surgery; Humans; Laparoscopy; Laparoscopy - adverse effects; Laparoscopy - methods; Meta-analysis; Miscarriage; Observational studies; Observational Studies as Topic; Obstetrics; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Complications - surgery; Premature birth; Studies; Surgery; Systematic review; Ultrasonic imaging; Greece; United States > US; Asia; Pregnancy; Appendicitis; Laparoscopy
• ISSN: 0035-8843; 1478-7083; 1478-7083
• DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2019.0011

Acute appendicitis is a common and serious situation during pregnancy, because of the increased risk of fetal loss and perforation in the third trimester, as well as a diagnostic difficulty. During recent years laparoscopic approach has been introduced to clinical practice with encouraging results. The purpose of this meta-analysis is to compare the surgical and obstetrical outcomes between laparoscopic and open appendectomy during pregnancy.
MEDLINE, SCOPUS, Clinicaltrials.gov, CENTRAL and Google Scholar were searched for studies reporting on postoperative outcomes between laparoscopic and open appendectomy during pregnancy. The random effects model (DerSimonian-Laird) was used to calculate pooled effect estimates when high heterogeneity was encountered, otherwise the fixed-effects (Mantel-Haenszel) model was implemented.
Twenty-one studies that enrolled 6276 pregnant women are included in the present meta-analysis. Of these women, 1963 underwent laparoscopic appendectomy and 4313 underwent an open appendectomy. Women who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy demonstrated an increase in fetal loss risk, while neonates of women that underwent open appendectomy presented decreased Apgar score at five minutes after birth. All the rest outcomes were similar between the two groups. The time that each study took place seemed to affect the comparison of birth weight and postoperative hospital stay between the two groups.
Laparoscopic appendectomy seems to be a relatively safe therapeutic option in pregnancy when it is indicated. Thus, it should be implemented in clinical practice, always considering the experience of the surgeon in such procedures. Nevertheless, the need of new studies to enhance this statement remains crucial.