Surgical risk assessment for gynecological oncologic patients

• Published in: Turkish journal of obstetrics and gynecology Vol. 16; no. 3; pp. 158 - 163
• Main Authors: Biçer, Çağlayan, Raoufi, Jalal, İşcan, Serhan Can, Güney, Mehmet, Erdemoğlu, Evrim
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Turkey Türk Jinekoloji ve Obstetrik Derneği 01-09-2019; Galenos Publishing House; Galenos Publishing
• Subjects: Clinical Investigation; Health risk assessment; Kadın Hastalıkları; Mortality; Ovarian cancer; Tıp; Womens health; Ankara; Türkiye; Gynecological oncology; metoprolol; surgical risk assessment; upper abdominal surgery; cerrahi risk değerlendirmesi; Jinekolojik onkoloji; üst batın cerrahisi
• ISSN: 2149-9322; 2149-9330
• DOI: 10.4274/tjod.galenos.2019.93584

Preoperative surgical risk assessment is important in terms of postoperative morbidity and mortality. Therefore, it is necessary to evaluate the efficacy and safety of these surgeries via an ideal risk assessment model, and reduce risks via applying some findings (for instance, perioperative beta-blockers). There are some risk assessment systems, but these have generally not been verified for patients with gynecologic cancer. The aim of this study was to assess the risk of surgery for gynecological oncologic patients and suggest an easy risk assessment model and risk reduction by applying our findings.
We retrospectively analyzed 258 gynecologic patients with cancer. Age, diagnosis, staging, performance scale, metoprolol use, heart, renal diabetes, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary disease, diabetes, operation type and length, carcinoma antigen 125, ascites, albumin, surgical procedure, hospitalization length, and complications were recorded.
Of the 258 patients, 173 patients (67.1%) had no complications, 43 patients (16.7%) had one and 42 patients (16.3%) had two or more complications. The most common complication was the acid-base imbalance (14%), followed by urinary tract infection (9.7%). Parameters associated with complications were performance status, ascites, operating length, metoprolol use, and upper abdominal surgery. In our proposed scoring model with a total score range 0-23, cut-off value points for both the presence and rate of complications was found as >5.
In gynecological patients with cancer, the addition of metoprolol use and upper abdominal surgery within preoperative risk assessment evaluation parameters are significantly effective in predicting the rate and severity of complications. Moreover, we have suggested a simple, practical, and convenient scoring model for this evaluation.