Development of the Mizes Anorectic Cognitions questionnaire-revised: Psychometric properties and factor structure in a large sample of eating disorder patients

Objective This project was designed to develop and test the psychometric properties and factor structure of a revision of the Mizes Anorectic Cognitions questionnaire (MAC). The goals of the revision were to improve the reliability and discriminant validity of the Weight and Approval subscale and to...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The International journal of eating disorders Vol. 28; no. 4; pp. 415 - 421
Main Authors: Mizes, J. Scott, Christiano, Beth, Madison, James, Post, Gail, Seime, Richard, Varnado, Paula
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: New York John Wiley & Sons, Inc 01-12-2000
Wiley
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Objective This project was designed to develop and test the psychometric properties and factor structure of a revision of the Mizes Anorectic Cognitions questionnaire (MAC). The goals of the revision were to improve the reliability and discriminant validity of the Weight and Approval subscale and to equalize the length of the three subscales. Also, the study compared the original MAC and the MAC‐R in terms of their psychometric properties. Method Twenty‐four new items were developed for potential inclusion in the MAC‐R, in addition to the original 33 items of the MAC. These items were administered to 205 eating disorder patients from five eating disorder clinics or programs, including inpatient, outpatient, and residential treatment settings that served diverse patient populations. Additionally, other measures of eating disorder constructs were administered to assess construct validity. Results Factor analysis of the large pool of items and item reduction resulted in the final 24‐item MAC‐R, each subscale being eight items in length. Results showed that the MAC‐R highly correlated with the MAC and other eating disorder questionnaires. Reliability of the MAC‐R was improved over that of the MAC. Two subscales of the MAC‐R discriminated among diagnostic groups, whereas the original MAC did not, indicating improved sensitivity of the revised scale. Discussion The MAC‐R appears to be an improvement over the original MAC. It provides useful information on the cognitions of eating‐disordered patients and merits further investigation into its psychometric properties. © 2000 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Int J Eat Disord 28: 415–421, 2000.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/WNG-KVF5530V-H
ArticleID:EAT9
istex:31420585997D8C3F43F28729B004E5826DD152E7
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0276-3478
1098-108X
DOI:10.1002/1098-108X(200012)28:4<415::AID-EAT9>3.0.CO;2-Z