Dehydration is an independent predictor of discharge outcome and admission cost in acute ischaemic stroke

Background and purpose Our aim was to investigate the influence of admission dehydration on the discharge outcome in acute ischaemic and hemorrhagic stroke. Methods Between January 2009 and December 2011, 4311 ischaemic and 1371 hemorrhagic stroke patients from the stroke registry of Chang Gung heal...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:European journal of neurology Vol. 21; no. 9; pp. 1184 - 1191
Main Authors: Liu, C.-H., Lin, S.-C., Lin, J.-R., Yang, J.-T., Chang, Y.-J., Chang, C.-H., Chang, T.-Y., Huang, K.-L., Ryu, S.-J., Lee, T.-H.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: England Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01-09-2014
John Wiley & Sons, Inc
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background and purpose Our aim was to investigate the influence of admission dehydration on the discharge outcome in acute ischaemic and hemorrhagic stroke. Methods Between January 2009 and December 2011, 4311 ischaemic and 1371 hemorrhagic stroke patients from the stroke registry of Chang Gung healthcare system were analyzed. The eligible patients were identified according to inclusion/exclusion criteria. In total, 2570 acute ischaemic and 573 acute hemorrhagic stroke patients were finally recruited. According to the blood urea nitrogen (BUN) to creatinine (Cr) ratio (BUN/Cr), these patients were divided into dehydrated (BUN/Cr ≥ 15) and non‐dehydrated (BUN/Cr < 15) groups. Demographics, admission costs and discharge outcomes including modified Rankin scale (mRS) and Barthel index (BI) were examined. Data were analyzed using multivariate analysis of two‐stage least squares including logistic and linear regression. Results Acute ischaemic stroke with admission dehydration had higher infection rates (P = 0.006), worse discharge BI (62.8 ± 37.4 vs. 73.4 ± 32.4, P < 0.001, adjusted P < 0.001), worse mRS (2.7 ± 1.6 vs. 2.3 ± 1.5, P < 0.001, adjusted P = 0.009) and higher admission costs (2470.8 ± 3160.8 vs. 1901.2 ± 2046.8 US dollars, P < 0.001, adjusted P = 0.013) than those without dehydration. However, acute hemorrhagic stroke with or without admission dehydration showd no difference in admission costs (P = 0.618) and discharge outcomes (BI, P = 0.058; mRS, P = 0.058). Conclusion Admission dehydration is associated with worse discharge outcomes and higher admission costs in acute ischaemic stroke but not in hemorrhagic stroke.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/WNG-LKVS8XMQ-H
istex:44B559147BAAC99F13281531C4F4E6247CE29459
Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taiwan - No. CMRPG35072; No. 35073; No. 39082; No. 39083; No. CMRPG3B0611; No. CMPRG3A0352; No. CMRPG3B0111
ArticleID:ENE12452
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
ISSN:1351-5101
1468-1331
DOI:10.1111/ene.12452