Left ventricular hypertrophy in incident dialysis patients randomized to treatment with hemofiltration or hemodialysis: results from the ProFil study

• Published in: Blood purification Vol. 32; no. 1; p. 21
• Main Authors: Alvestrand, Anders, Ledebo, Ingrid, Hagerman, Inger, Wingren, Kerstin, Mattsson, Eva, Qureshi, Abdul Rashid, Gutierrez, Alberto
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Switzerland 01-01-2011
• Subjects: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antihypertensive Agents - administration & dosage; Blood Pressure; Cohort Studies; Denmark; Echocardiography, Doppler; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Hemofiltration - methods; Humans; Hypertension - drug therapy; Hypertension - prevention & control; Hypertrophy, Left Ventricular - diagnostic imaging; Kidney Failure, Chronic - diagnostic imaging; Kidney Failure, Chronic - physiopathology; Kidney Failure, Chronic - therapy; Male; Middle Aged; Renal Dialysis - methods; Sweden
• ISSN: 1421-9735
• DOI: 10.1159/000323140

Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) is present in a majority of hemodialysis (HD) patients and is among the strongest risk factors for cardiovascular events and mortality. Hemofiltration (HF), a purely convective dialysis treatment, has been associated with enhanced hemodynamic stability compared with HD, possibly as a result of a more physiologic removal of fluid and solutes.
In a randomized controlled study conducted at ten dialysis centers in Sweden and Denmark, incident patients (HD <3 months) without clinical signs or history of cardiovascular disease were randomized to treatment with either online, predilution HF or low-flux HD. The primary endpoint was change in left ventricular mass index (LVMI), as measured by two-dimensional M-mode and Doppler echocardiography.
The analyses included 34 patients (18 HF, 16 HD) followed for up to 2 years. At baseline, 65% of the patients had LVH, but LVMI did not differ between the study groups. In the HF group, LVMI decreased by 22 ± 48 g/m(2) during a mean treatment time of 19 ± 7 months, while in the HD group the decrease was 15 ± 57 g/m(2) during 16 ± 7 months. As analyzed by MANOVA (mixed model), the difference in LVMI over the whole period was statistically significant (p = 0.03) with a more favorable outcome in HF. Blood pressure and other study variables did not differ between the groups, but at baseline and throughout the study, HF patients required heavier antihypertensive treatment.
In incident dialysis patients, long-term predilution HF, a purely convective dialysis treatment, is associated with a significantly more favorable development of LVMI compared with regular low-flux HD. Considering the predictive strength of LVMI as a risk factor, the quantitative difference between the treatments is of clinical importance.