Post-sphincterotomy Transampullary Balloon Dilation Is a Safe and Effective Technique

• Published in: Digestive diseases and sciences Vol. 54; no. 3; pp. 670 - 674
• Main Authors: Kowalski, Thomas, Nathwani, Rahul A, Assis, David, Salese, Leonardo, Banwait, Kuldip, Loren, David
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Boston Boston : Springer US 01-03-2009; Springer US; Springer; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Biochemistry; Biological and medical sciences; Catheterization - adverse effects; Choledocholithiasis - therapy; Digestive system; Feeding. Feeding behavior; Female; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology; Gastroenterology; Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen; Hepatology; Humans; Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects); Liver. Biliary tract. Portal circulation. Exocrine pancreas; Male; Medical sciences; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Middle Aged; Oncology; Original Article; Other diseases. Semiology; Radiodiagnosis. Nmr imagery. Nmr spectrometry; Retrospective Studies; Sphincterotomy, Endoscopic; Transplant Surgery; Treatment Outcome; Vertebrates: anatomy and physiology, studies on body, several organs or systems; Balloon dilation; ERCP; Sphincterotomy; Pancreatitis; Cholangiopancreatography; Radiodiagnosis; Metabolic diseases; Treatment; Surgery; Gastroenterology; Digestive diseases; Endoscopy; Technique; Pancreatic disease
• ISSN: 0163-2116; 1573-2568
• DOI: 10.1007/s10620-008-0376-x

Purpose To evaluate the safety and efficacy of performing ampullary balloon dilation (ABD) following endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES). Methods Retrospective review of patients that underwent ABD at Thomas Jefferson University from 2000 to 2007. In all cases, dilation was performed with Hurricane® RX hydrostatic balloons (Boston Scientific, Natick MA) or CRETM esophageal dilating balloons (Boston Scientific, Natick MA). Results ABD following ES was performed in 69 patients. The procedure was performed for choledocholithiasis in 58%, abnormal imaging in 26%, and abnormal liver enzymes in 23% of patients. ABD following ES was 86% successful in achieving the intended therapeutic goal of the procedure. Pancreatitis (2.9%) post endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) occurred in two individuals, with one case of hemorrhage (1.5%) and one perforation (1.5%). Conclusion ABD following ES is a safe and effective alternative to ES alone, particularly for the extraction of large common bile duct (CBD) stones.