Pancreatic tumors: comparison of dual-phase helical CT and endoscopic sonography

The purpose of this study was to compare dual-phase helical CT and endosonography for the diagnosis and staging of pancreatic tumors. Thirty patients with suspected pancreatic tumors underwent endosonography and dual-phase helical CT. A pathologic diagnosis was obtained in all cases with surgery (n...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:American journal of roentgenology (1976) Vol. 170; no. 5; pp. 1315 - 1322
Main Authors: Legmann, P, Vignaux, O, Dousset, B, Baraza, AJ, Palazzo, L, Dumontier, I, Coste, J, Louvel, A, Roseau, G, Couturier, D, Bonnin, A
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Leesburg, VA Am Roentgen Ray Soc 01-05-1998
American Roentgen Ray Society
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The purpose of this study was to compare dual-phase helical CT and endosonography for the diagnosis and staging of pancreatic tumors. Thirty patients with suspected pancreatic tumors underwent endosonography and dual-phase helical CT. A pathologic diagnosis was obtained in all cases with surgery (n = 23) or biopsy (n = 7), resulting in 27 neoplasms. Dual-phase helical CT and endosonographic findings were correlated with surgical and pathologic findings to determine diagnosis and resectability of pancreatic tumors. Overall diagnostic sensitivity was 92% for dual-phase helical CT and 100% for endosonography (p = .45). Overall accuracy for staging of pancreatic tumors was 93% for both dual-phase helical CT and endosonography. Overall accuracy for predicting resectability was 90% for both dual-phase helical CT and endosonography. Accuracy of predicting unresectability was 100% for dual-phase helical CT and 86% for endosonography (p > .80). Differences were not considered statistically significant. Dual-phase helical CT and endoscopic sonography do not differ significantly for diagnosis and assessment of resectability of pancreatic tumors.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0361-803X
1546-3141
DOI:10.2214/ajr.170.5.9574609