Rice varieties with similar amylose content differ in starch digestibility and glycemic response in humans

Three high-amylose rice varieties, IR42, IR36, and IR62, with similar chemical composition including amylose content (26.7–27.0%), were cooked under the same conditions and tested for in vitro digestibility as well as blood glucose and insulin responses in healthy human volunteers. The starch-digest...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The American journal of clinical nutrition Vol. 54; no. 5; pp. 871 - 877
Main Authors: Panlasigui, LN, Thompson, LU, Juliano, BO, Perez, CM, Yiu, SH, Greenberg, GR
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Bethesda, MD Elsevier Inc 01-11-1991
American Society for Clinical Nutrition
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Three high-amylose rice varieties, IR42, IR36, and IR62, with similar chemical composition including amylose content (26.7–27.0%), were cooked under the same conditions and tested for in vitro digestibility as well as blood glucose and insulin responses in healthy human volunteers. The starch-digestion rate and the glycemic and insulin responses were the highest in IR42, followed by IR36 and, then, IR62. The differences were not due to unabsorbed carbohydrate but were related to their physicochemical properties, such as gelatinization temperature, minimum cooking time, amylograph consistency, and volume expansion upon cooking. When the three varieties were cooked for their minimum cooking time, they had the same degree of gelatinization and their starch-digestion rates and glycemic responses were similar. We conclude that amylose content alone is not a good predictor of starch-digestion rate or glycemic response. Rice varieties with similar high-amylose contents can differ in physicochemical (gelatinization) properties and this, in turn, can influence starch digestibility and blood glucose response.
Bibliography:S20
S30
9163744
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0002-9165
1938-3207
DOI:10.1093/ajcn/54.5.871