Demand response potential of district heating and ventilation in an educational office building

This study examines the influence of demand-response control strategies on thermal conditions, indoor air CO 2 concentration, and heating energy cost and consumption in an educational office building heated by a district heating system in a cold climate. The real-time pricing-based demand response i...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Science & technology for the built environment Vol. 26; no. 3; pp. 304 - 319
Main Authors: Vand, Behrang, Martin, Kristian, Jokisalo, Juha, Kosonen, Risto, Hast, Aira
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis 15-03-2020
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This study examines the influence of demand-response control strategies on thermal conditions, indoor air CO 2 concentration, and heating energy cost and consumption in an educational office building heated by a district heating system in a cold climate. The real-time pricing-based demand response is applied for space heating, heating of ventilation, and adjustment of airflow rates. The ventilation analysis covers both constant and variable air volumes systems. The applied demand-response algorithms regulate room air temperature set-points for space heating, temperature set-point for supply air, and CO 2 set-point adjusted with the variable air volume ventilation system. The accepted room air temperature range was 20-24.5 °C and CO 2 concentration within 800-1200 ppm. This study was conducted with the validated dynamic building simulation tool IDA ICE. The results illustrate that the maximum yearly savings by demand response of space heating and ventilation with the constant air volume ventilation system are around 3 and 6% for the heating energy consumption and heating energy cost, respectively. For the variable air volume system, the heating energy consumption, heating energy cost, electricity consumption, and electricity cost saved by demand-response control can be up to 8, 11, 9, and 2%, respectively.
ISSN:2374-4731
2374-474X
DOI:10.1080/23744731.2019.1693207