Consensus quality indicators for monitoring multiple sclerosis

Multiple sclerosis (MS) as a chronic, degenerative autoimmune disease of the central nervous system has a longitudinal and heterogeneous course with increasing treatment options and risk profiles requiring constant monitoring of a growing number of parameters. Despite treatment guidelines, there is...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Lancet regional health. Europe Vol. 40; p. 100891
Main Authors: Voigt, Isabel, Fischer, Stefanie, Proschmann, Undine, Konofalska, Urszula, Richter, Peggy, Schlieter, Hannes, Berger, Thomas, Meuth, Sven G., Hartung, Hans-Peter, Akgün, Katja, Ziemssen, Tjalf
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: England Elsevier Ltd 01-05-2024
Elsevier
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Multiple sclerosis (MS) as a chronic, degenerative autoimmune disease of the central nervous system has a longitudinal and heterogeneous course with increasing treatment options and risk profiles requiring constant monitoring of a growing number of parameters. Despite treatment guidelines, there is a lack of strategic and individualised monitoring pathways, including respective quality indicators (QIs). To address this, we systematically developed transparent, traceable, and measurable QIs for MS monitoring. Through literature review, expert discussions, and consensus-building, existing QIs were identified and refined. In a two-stage online Delphi process involving MS specialists (on average 53 years old and with 25 years of professional experience), the QIs were evaluated for content, clarity, and intelligibility, resulting in a set of 24 QIs and checklists to assess the quality of care. The final QIs provide a structured approach to document, monitor, and enhance the quality of care for people with MS across their treatment journey.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ObjectType-Review-1
ISSN:2666-7762
2666-7762
DOI:10.1016/j.lanepe.2024.100891