A Comparative Analysis of Selected Methods for Determining Young's Modulus in Polylactic Acid Samples Manufactured with the FDM Method

• Published in: Materials Vol. 15; no. 1; p. 149
• Main Authors: Pszczółkowski, Bartosz, Nowak, Konrad W, Rejmer, Wojciech, Bramowicz, Mirosław, Dzadz, Łukasz, Gałęcki, Remigiusz
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Switzerland MDPI AG 25-12-2021; MDPI
• Subjects: 3-D printers; 3D printing; ABS resins; Acrylonitrile butadiene styrene; Carbon; Fused deposition modeling; impulse excitation technique; Manufacturers; Manufacturing; Mechanical properties; Methods; Modulus of elasticity; Nondestructive testing; Polylactic acid; Tensile tests; Three dimensional printing; ultrasonic testing; Young’s modulus; Young’s modulus; polylactic acid; 3D printing; impulse excitation technique; ultrasonic testing
• ISSN: 1996-1944; 1996-1944
• DOI: 10.3390/ma15010149

The objective of this study was to compare three methods for determining the Young's modulus of polylactic acid (PLA) and acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene (ABS) samples. The samples were manufactured viathe fused filament fabrication/fused deposition modeling (FFF/FDM) 3D printing technique. Samples for analysis were obtained at processing temperatures of 180 °C to 230 °C. Measurements were performed with the use of two nondestructive techniques: the impulse excitation technique (IET) and the ultrasonic (US) method. The results were compared with values obtained in static tensile tests (STT), which ranged from 2.06 ± 0.03 to 2.15 ± 0.05 GPa. Similar changes in Young's modulus were observed in response to the processing temperatures of the compared methods. The values generated by the US method were closer to the results of the STT, but still diverged considerably, and the error exceeded 10% in all cases. Based on the present findings, it might be concluded that the results of destructive and nondestructive tests differ by approximately 1 GPa.