1mΨ influences the performance of various positive-stranded RNA virus-based replicons

Self-amplifying RNAs (saRNAs) are versatile vaccine platforms that take advantage of a viral RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) to amplify the messenger RNA (mRNA) of an antigen of interest encoded within the backbone of the viral genome once inside the target cell. In recent years, more saRNA vacc...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Scientific reports Vol. 14; no. 1; pp. 17634 - 13
Main Authors: Miyazato, Paola, Noguchi, Takafumi, Ogawa, Fumiyo, Sugimoto, Takeshi, Fauzyah, Yuzy, Sasaki, Ryo, Ebina, Hirotaka
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: London Nature Publishing Group UK 31-07-2024
Nature Publishing Group
Nature Portfolio
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Self-amplifying RNAs (saRNAs) are versatile vaccine platforms that take advantage of a viral RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) to amplify the messenger RNA (mRNA) of an antigen of interest encoded within the backbone of the viral genome once inside the target cell. In recent years, more saRNA vaccines have been clinically tested with the hope of reducing the vaccination dose compared to the conventional mRNA approach. The use of N1-methyl-pseudouridine (1mΨ), which enhances RNA stability and reduces the innate immune response triggered by RNAs, is among the improvements included in the current mRNA vaccines. In the present study, we evaluated the effects of this modified nucleoside on various saRNA platforms based on different viruses. The results showed that different stages of the replication process were affected depending on the backbone virus. For TNCL, an insect virus of the Alphanodavirus genus, replication was impaired by poor recognition of viral RNA by RdRp. In contrast, the translation step was severely abrogated in coxsackievirus B3 (CVB3), a member of the Picornaviridae family. Finally, the effects of 1mΨ on Semliki forest virus (SFV), were not detrimental in in vitro studies, but no advantages were observed when immunogenicity was tested in vivo.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:2045-2322
2045-2322
DOI:10.1038/s41598-024-68617-y