Trade-offs in initial and long-term handling efficiency of PIT-tag and photographic identification methods

• Published in: Ecological indicators Vol. 130; p. 108110
• Main Authors: Roberts, Lindsey S., Feuka, Abigail B., Muths, Erin, Hardy, Bennett M., Bailey, Larissa L.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Elsevier Ltd 01-11-2021; Elsevier
• Subjects: Amphibian; Capture-recapture; Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem; Marking; Rocky Mountain National Park; Stress; Marking; Capture-recapture; Rocky Mountain National Park; Amphibian; Stress; Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem
• ISSN: 1470-160X; 1872-7034
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108110

[Display omitted]
•Marking methods for identification differ in handling time (a proxy for stress).•Cumulative handling time depends on species and study characteristics.•Species survival, capture probabilities,and study design: Important considerations.•Some amphibians incur less handling time using PIT tags vs photography.•Shiny App calculates handling time using species- and study-specific parameters.
Individual identification is required for long-term investigations that examine population-level changes in survival or abundance, and mechanisms associated with these changes in wild populations. Such identification generally requires the application of a unique mark, or the documentation of characteristics distinctive to each individual animal. To minimize impacts to often declining populations, scientific and ethical concerns encourage marking strategies that minimize handling time (i.e., stress) for captured individuals. We examined the relative efficacy of passive integrated transponder (PIT)-tagging and photo-identification to identify individual Boreal toads (Anaxyrus boreas boreas) in field and indoor settings. We evaluated whether initial handling time was influenced by identification method (PIT-tag or photo-identification) or environment (field or indoor) and assessed the applicability of each method in long-term monitoring programs. Initial handling time was higher for PIT-tagging than photo-identification and higher in the field than in an indoor environment; however, handling time for previously PIT-tagged individuals was greatly reduced such that photo-identification led to > 5.5 times more handling time than PIT-tagging over the course of a toad's lifetime. Investigators must determine the trade-off between initial and subsequent handling times to minimize the expected (mean) cumulative handling time for an individual over the course of a study. Cumulative handling time is a function of the study design and the species’ survival and detection probabilities. We developed a Shiny Application to allow investigators to determine the identification method that minimizes handling time for their own study system.