Major drivers of land degradation risk in Western Serbia: Current trends and future scenarios
•Spatial-temporal dynamics of LDD changes in Western Serbia was studied.•ESAs method has been adapted to socio-ecological characteristics of studied area.•Antropogenic drivers have the highest impact on current LDD.•LDD shows increasing trend from 2005 to 2100 under both scenarios (RCP4.5; RCP8.5).•...
Saved in:
Published in: | Ecological indicators Vol. 123; p. 107377 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier Ltd
01-04-2021
Elsevier |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | •Spatial-temporal dynamics of LDD changes in Western Serbia was studied.•ESAs method has been adapted to socio-ecological characteristics of studied area.•Antropogenic drivers have the highest impact on current LDD.•LDD shows increasing trend from 2005 to 2100 under both scenarios (RCP4.5; RCP8.5).•SPEI is the most efficient parameter in explaining climate changes on LDD.
Land degradation and desertification (LDD) is one of the greatest ecological challenges of today, with climate change resulting from anthropogenic factors a major cause of it. Recent projections of LDD in the Mediterranean region indicate a gradual widening of arid areas due to increased aridity and global warming by the end of the 21st century. Therefore, this study used the MEDALUS method to identify sensitivity to LDD in Western Serbia between 1986 and 2005 and to assess possible effects of climate change (RCP4.5 and RCP8.5 scenarios) on land degradation processes by the end of the 21st century. Likewise, analysis of possible major drivers of degradation was conducted using principal component analysis (PCA) and multiple linear regression analysis (MLRA). The study revealed that degradation processes in the study area were found to be most influenced by anthropogenic drivers (34.4%), less so by natural/anthropogenic ones (23.5%), and least by natural factors (20.1%). Results also showed that critical areas of LDD susceptibility account for nearly 37% of the study area, transitional areas cover 35%, while 27% constitutes potentially safe areas. Additionally, critical areas were projected to expand by 33.6% (RCP4.5) and 51.7% (RCP8.5) by 2100 as a result of predicted temperature increases and a reduction in precipitation in the study area. This study also revealed that the Standardised Precipitation-Evapotranspiration Index (SPEI) better explains the impact of climate change on LDD than other indices, bearing in mind the capacity of this index to detect temporal oscillations in drought in the context of climate change, and it is therefore a reliable climate parameter for this method. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1470-160X 1872-7034 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107377 |