Clinically unrecognized ventricular dysfunction in young diabetic patients

• Published in: Journal of the American College of Cardiology Vol. 4; no. 2; pp. 234 - 238
• Main Authors: Mildenberger, Richard R., Bar-Shlomo, Ben, Druck, Maurice N., Jablonsky, George, Morch, John E., David Hilton, J., Kenshole, Anne B., Forbath, Nicholas, McLaughlin, Peter R.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: New York, NY Elsevier Inc 01-08-1984; Elsevier Science
• Subjects: Adult; Associated diseases and complications; Biological and medical sciences; Cardiac Output; Diabetes Complications; Diabetes Mellitus - physiopathology; Diabetes. Impaired glucose tolerance; Endocrine pancreas. Apud cells (diseases); Endocrinopathies; Exercise Test; Female; Heart Diseases - diagnostic imaging; Heart Diseases - etiology; Heart Diseases - physiopathology; Heart Rate; Heart Ventricles - diagnostic imaging; Heart Ventricles - physiopathology; Humans; Male; Medical sciences; Radionuclide Imaging; Stroke Volume; Endocrinopathy; Physical exercise; Human; Concomitant disease; Heart disease; Diabetes mellitus; Young adult; Left ventricle; Ejection fraction
• ISSN: 0735-1097; 1558-3597
• DOI: 10.1016/S0735-1097(84)80207-7

Left ventricular function at rest and during supine bicycle exercise was assessed by gated radionuclide angiography in 20 diabetic patients and 18 normal control subjects without clinical evidence of heart disease. The diabetic patients were aged 21 to 44 years and all except one used insulin. No subject developed chest pain or electrocardiographic changes during exercise. Both groups had a similar rest and exercise heart rate and blood pressure, and both achieved similar work loads.
The control group had an ejection fraction at rest of 65.4 ± 6.2% (mean ± SD) and only 1 of 18 showed a decrease with exercise; peak exercise ejection fraction averaged 77.1 ± 7.8%. The diabetic group had a mean ejection fraction at rest of 63.7 ± 6.5%, similar to that of the control group, but 7 of 20 showed a decrease during exercise; the exercise ejection fraction averaged 67.7 ± 9.7%, significantly lower than that of the control group (p < 0.01). The diabetic patients varied widely in ejection fraction response to exercise, ranging from an increase of 25% to a decrease of 21%. This response did not correlate with age, sex, duration of diabetes, smoking, retinopathy, exercise heart rate, blood pressure or rate-pressure product, work load attained or ejection fraction at rest.
These data suggest that approximately one-third of patients with diabetes have subclinical left ventricular dysfunction without correlation to risk factors for atherosclerosis or other diabetic complications. Whether this is due to unrecognized coronary artery disease or primary myocardial disease remains unknown.