Collective events and individual affect shape autobiographical memory

• Published in: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS Vol. 120; no. 29; p. e2221919120
• Main Authors: Rouhani, Nina, Stanley, Damian, Adolphs, Ralph
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States National Academy of Sciences 18-07-2023
• Subjects: Biological Sciences; Emotions; Humans; Memory, Episodic; Mental Recall; Natural Language Processing; Pandemics; Post traumatic stress disorder; Recall; Shape memory; Social Sciences; collective memory; surprise; emotion; autobiographical memory; temporal memory
• ISSN: 0027-8424; 1091-6490; 1091-6490
• DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2221919120

How do collective events shape how we remember our lives? We leveraged advances in natural language processing as well as a rich, longitudinal assessment of 1,000 Americans throughout 2020 to examine how memory is influenced by two prominent factors: surprise and emotion. Autobiographical memory for 2020 displayed a unique signature: There was a substantial bump in March, aligning with pandemic onset and lockdowns, consistent across three memory collections 1 y apart. We further investigated how emotion, using both immediate and retrieved measures, predicted the amount and content of autobiographical memory: Negative affect increased recall across all measures, whereas its more clinical indices, depression and posttraumatic stress disorder, selectively increased nonepisodic recall. Finally, in a separate cohort, we found pandemic news to be better remembered, surprising, and negative, while lockdowns compressed remembered time. Our work connects laboratory findings to the real world and delineates the effects of acute versus clinical signatures of negative emotion on memory.