Evaluation of Sensor Technology to Detect Fall Risk and Prevent Falls in Acute Care

Sensor technology that dynamically identifies hospitalized patients' fall risk and detects and alerts nurses of high-risk patients' early exits out of bed has potential for reducing fall rates and preventing patient harm. During Phase 1 (August 2014–January 2015) of a previously reported p...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety Vol. 43; no. 8; pp. 414 - 421
Main Authors: Potter, Patricia, Allen, Kelly, Costantinou, Eileen, Klinkenberg, William Dean, Malen, Jill, Norris, Traci, O'Connor, Elizabeth, Roney, Wilhemina, Tymkew, Heidi Hahn, Wolf, Laurie
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Netherlands Elsevier Inc 01-08-2017
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Sensor technology that dynamically identifies hospitalized patients' fall risk and detects and alerts nurses of high-risk patients' early exits out of bed has potential for reducing fall rates and preventing patient harm. During Phase 1 (August 2014–January 2015) of a previously reported performance improvement project, an innovative depth sensor was evaluated on two inpatient medical units to study fall characteristics. In Phase 2 (April 2015–January 2016), a combined depth and bed sensor system designed to assign patient fall probability, detect patient bed exits, and subsequently prevent falls was evaluated. Fall detection depth sensors remained in place on two medicine units; bed sensors used to detect patient bed exits were added on only one of the medicine units. Fall rates and fall with injury rates were evaluated on both units. During Phase 2, the designated evaluation unit had 14 falls, for a fall rate of 2.22 per 1,000 patient-days—a 54.1% reduction compared with the Phase 1 fall rate. The difference in rates from Phase 1 to Phase 2 was statistically significant (z = 2.20; p = 0.0297). The comparison medicine unit had 30 falls—a fall rate of 4.69 per 1,000 patient-days, representing a 57.9% increase as compared with Phase 1. A fall detection sensor system affords a level of surveillance that standard fall alert systems do not have. Fall prevention remains a complex issue, but sensor technology is a viable fall prevention option.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1553-7250
1938-131X
DOI:10.1016/j.jcjq.2017.05.003