A daily examination of executive functioning and chronotype in bedtime procrastination

• Published in: Sleep (New York, N.Y.) Vol. 46; no. 8; p. 1
• Main Authors: Carlson, Steven E, Suchy, Yana, Baron, Kelly Glazer, Johnson, Kimberley T, Williams, Paula G
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: US Oxford University Press 14-08-2023
• Subjects: Analysis; Chronotype; Cross-Sectional Studies; Emotional Regulation; Executive Function; Female; Humans; Insomnia; Laws, regulations and rules; Male; Procrastination; Self report; Sleep; Young Adult; chronotype; multilevel modeling; bedtime procrastination; executive functioning; Stroop; sleep behaviors
• ISSN: 0161-8105; 1550-9109
• DOI: 10.1093/sleep/zsad145

Abstract
Study Objectives
Bedtime procrastination, or delays in bedtime not attributable to external obligations, is a behavioral tendency that undermines sleep and is conceptualized as a consequence of poor self-regulation. Prior studies investigating the mechanistic role of self-regulation in bedtime procrastination relied on cross-sectional methods and self-reported self-regulation. The present study examined the association between bedtime procrastination and both objective and self-reported executive functioning (EF) as indices of self-regulation, as well as the moderating role of chronotype, using methods that examined these associations at the daily level.
Methods
A total of 273 young adult participants (78% female; Mage = 24.4) completed daily measures of objective EF (i.e., Stroop task), self-reported EF (i.e., self-reported cognitive, behavioral, and emotional regulation difficulties), and bedtime procrastination over 14 days, in addition to measures of chronotype. Multilevel models were constructed to examine the associations between bedtime procrastination and EF, as well as EF-chronotype interactions.
Results
Poorer daily objective EF and self-reported behavioral regulation were associated with greater same-night bedtime procrastination. Additionally, poorer subjective cognitive and emotional regulation were associated with greater average bedtime procrastination across 14 days. Later chronotypes reported greater bedtime procrastination than early chronotypes.
Conclusions
The present study provides support for the association between EF and bedtime procrastination, but finds no evidence for the moderating role of chronotype in this association. Results suggest that some EF processes may be more relevant to bedtime procrastination than others. Current findings have implications for assessment and intervention for this consequential sleep-relevant behavioral tendency.
Graphical abstract
Graphical Abstract