Performance of immunological response in predicting virological failure

• Published in: AIDS research and human retroviruses Vol. 29; no. 3; p. 541
• Main Authors: Ingole, Nayana, Mehta, Preeti, Pazare, Amar, Paranjpe, Supriya, Sarkate, Purva
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States 01-03-2013
• Subjects: Adolescent; Adult; Anti-Retroviral Agents - therapeutic use; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Cross-Sectional Studies; Drug Monitoring - methods; Female; HIV Infections - drug therapy; HIV Infections - immunology; HIV Infections - pathology; HIV Infections - virology; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Predictive Value of Tests; Prognosis; Prospective Studies; Sensitivity and Specificity; Treatment Failure; Viral Load; Young Adult
• ISSN: 1931-8405
• DOI: 10.1089/aid.2012.0266

In HIV-infected individuals on antiretroviral therapy (ART), the decision on when to switch from first-line to second-line therapy is dictated by treatment failure, and this can be measured in three ways: clinically, immunologically, and virologically. While viral load (VL) decreases and CD4 cell increases typically occur together after starting ART, discordant responses may be seen. Hence the current study was designed to determine the immunological and virological response to ART and to evaluate the utility of immunological response to predict virological failure. All treatment-naive HIV-positive individuals aged >18 years who were eligible for ART were enrolled and assessed at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months clinically and by CD4 cell count and viral load estimations. The patients were categorized as showing concordant favorable (CF), immunological only (IO), virological only (VO), and concordant unfavorable responses (CU). The efficiency of immunological failure to predict virological failure was analyzed across various levels of virological failure (VL>50, >500, and >5,000 copies/ml). At 6 months, 87(79.81%), 7(5.5%), 13 (11.92%), and 2 (1.83%) patients and at 12 months 61(69.3%), 9(10.2%), 16 (18.2%), and 2 (2.3%) patients had CF, IO, VO, and CU responses, respectively. Immunological failure criteria had a very low sensitivity (11.1-40%) and positive predictive value (8.3-25%) to predict virological failure. Immunological criteria do not accurately predict virological failure resulting in significant misclassification of therapeutic responses. There is an urgent need for inclusion of viral load testing in the initiation and monitoring of ART.