Effect of Treatment with Zinc Gluconate or Zinc Acetate on Experimental and Natural Colds

Two clinical trials were conducted, one involving 273 subjects with experimental rhinovirus colds and the other involving 281 subjects with natural colds. Symptomatic volunteers were randomized to receive oral lozenges containing zinc gluconate (13.3 mg), zinc acetate (5 or 11.5 mg), or placebo. The...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Clinical infectious diseases Vol. 31; no. 5; pp. 1202 - 1208
Main Authors: Turner, Ronald B., Cetnarowski, Wes E.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Chicago, IL The University of Chicago Press 01-11-2000
University of Chicago Press
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Two clinical trials were conducted, one involving 273 subjects with experimental rhinovirus colds and the other involving 281 subjects with natural colds. Symptomatic volunteers were randomized to receive oral lozenges containing zinc gluconate (13.3 mg), zinc acetate (5 or 11.5 mg), or placebo. The median duration of illness in zinc gluconate recipients was 2.5 days, contrasted with 3.5 days in the placebo recipients (P = .035), in the experimental colds study. Zinc gluconate had no effect on symptom severity and zinc acetate had no effect on either duration or severity. Neither formulation had an effect on the duration or severity of natural cold symptoms. Evaluation of blinding, taste, and adverse events revealed no significant differences among the 4 treatment arms. Zinc compounds appear to have little utility for common-cold treatment.
Bibliography:Written informed consent was obtained from all volunteers in these studies, and the guidelines of the US Department of Health and Human Services for human experimentation were followed.
ark:/67375/HXZ-TJPCS5K5-T
istex:911080C231B1A0DB38931370241E07A9A33F28F0
ISSN:1058-4838
1537-6591
DOI:10.1086/317437