A Comparison of Mechanical Thrombectomy in the M1 and M2 Segments of the Middle Cerebral Artery: A Review of 585 Consecutive Patients

• Published in: Interventional neurology Vol. 6; no. 3-4; pp. 191 - 198
• Main Authors: Bhogal, Pervinder, Bücke, Philipp, AlMatter, Muhammad, Ganslandt, Oliver, Bäzner, Hansjörg, Henkes, Hans, Aguilar Pérez, Marta
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Basel, Switzerland S. Karger AG 01-10-2017
• Subjects: Original Paper; Stroke; Mechanical thrombectomy; M1 segment; M2 segment
• ISSN: 1664-9737; 1664-5545
• DOI: 10.1159/000475535

Background: Mechanical thrombectomy for anterior-circulation large-vessel occlusion has shown benefit; however, the question of whether this technique is safe and effective in the distal vasculature remains unanswered. We sought to compare the outcome data from mechanical thrombectomy of the M2 branches of the middle cerebral artery (MCA) with those of the M1 segment. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of patients with acute ischaemic stroke undergoing mechanical thrombectomy of isolated M1 or M2 branches of the MCA between August 2008 and August 2016. Results: We identified 585 patients, 479 with M1 occlusions and 106 with M2 occlusions. The average age was 72 ± 12.8 and 68 ± 13.8 years, respectively (p = 0.007). The baseline Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomographic (ASPECT) score was similar in both cohorts, but patients with M1 occlusions presented with higher mean National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores of 15.7 compared to 11.8 (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the average procedure time for each cohort; fewer thrombectomy attempts were required in the M2 cohort (2.3 vs. 1.8, p = 0.0004), but the overall time to recanalization was longer in the M2 cohort (353 vs. 399 min, p < 0.001). Similar rates of successful reperfusion (Thrombolysis in Ischaemic Stroke score [TICI] ≥2b 88.5 vs. 90.5%, p = 0.612) were seen, but food outcome (modified Rankin Scale ≤2) was lower in M1 occlusions (37.2 vs. 54.3%, p < 0.001). Rates of symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage were similar. Conclusion: Good clinical outcomes can be achieved for both groups with no significant differences in procedure length, final TICI recanalization rates or intracranial haemorrhage between the M1 and M2 cohorts.