Preformed GroES oligomers are not required as functional cochaperonins

We have previously shown that the C-terminal sequence of GroES is required for oligomerization [Seale and Horowitz (1995), J. Biol. Chem. 270, 30268-30270]. In this report, we have generated a C-terminal deletion mutant of GroES with a significantly destabilized oligomer and have investigated its fu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Protein Chemistry Vol. 16; no. 7; pp. 661 - 668
Main Authors: Seale, J W, Chirgwin, J M, Demeler, B, Horowitz, P M
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: United States Springer Nature B.V 01-10-1997
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:We have previously shown that the C-terminal sequence of GroES is required for oligomerization [Seale and Horowitz (1995), J. Biol. Chem. 270, 30268-30270]. In this report, we have generated a C-terminal deletion mutant of GroES with a significantly destabilized oligomer and have investigated its function in the chaperonin-assisted protein folding cycle. Removal of the two C-terminal residues of GroES results in a cochaperonin [GroESD(96-97)] that is monomeric at concentrations where GroES function is assessed. Using equilibrium ultracentrifugation, we measured the dissociation constant for the oligomer-monomer equilibrium to be 7.3 x 10(-34)M6. The GroESD(96-97) is fully active as a cochaperonin. This mutant is able to inhibit the ATPase activity of GroEL to levels comparable to wild-type GroES. It is also able to assist the refolding of urea-denatured rhodanese by GroEL. While GroESD(96-97) can function at levels comparable to wild-type GroES, higher concentrations of mutant are required to produce the same effect. These results support the idea that the performed GroES heptamer is not required for function, but they suggest that the oligomeric cochaperonin is most efficient.
ISSN:0277-8033
1572-3887
1573-4943
DOI:10.1023/A:1026350303043