DOES IDIOSYNCRATIC BUSINESS RISK MATTER FOR GROWTH?

Several imperfections can prevent entrepreneurs from diversifying away the idiosyncratic risk of their business. As a result idiosyncratic risk discourages entrepreneurial activity and hinders growth, with the effects being stronger in economies with lower risk diversification opportunities. In acco...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of the European Economic Association Vol. 11; no. 2; pp. 343 - 368
Main Authors: Michelacci, Claudio, Schivardi, Fabiano
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Malden, USA Wiley-Blackwell 01-04-2013
Blackwell Publishing Inc
Oxford University Press
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Several imperfections can prevent entrepreneurs from diversifying away the idiosyncratic risk of their business. As a result idiosyncratic risk discourages entrepreneurial activity and hinders growth, with the effects being stronger in economies with lower risk diversification opportunities. In accordance with this prediction, we find that OECD countries with low levels of risk diversification opportunities (as measured by the relevance of family firms or of widely held companies) perform relatively worse (in terms of productivity, investment, and business creation) in sectors characterized by high idiosyncratic risk. Differently from previous literature, we allow risk to be country specific. Since risk is endogenous to risk diversification opportunities, we instrument its value using sectoral risk in the United States, a country where idiosyncratic business risk can be more easily diversified away. Tackling the endogeneity of risk and recognizing that it varies by country magnifies the estimated effects of risk on growth.
Bibliography:Acknowledgments: Both authors are affiliated with CEPR. We are grateful to the editor and three anonymous referees for useful suggestions. We have benefited from the comments of Francesco Caselli, Antonio Ciccone, Gianluca Clementi, Andrew Ellul, Luigi Guiso, Enisse Kharroubi, Thomas Philippon, Mario Padula, and seminar participants at the Universities of Naples, Sassari, Cagliari, and Venice; EIEF, at the CREI‐CEPR conference on Finance, Growth, and the Structure of the Economy and at the Bank of Italy conference on Trends in the Italian Productive System. We also thank Diana Nicoletti for helping us with Thomson Datastream. Fabiano Schivardi thanks the European Community’s Seventh Framework Programme (grant agreement n. 216813) for financial support.
The editor in charge of this paper was Fabrizio Zilibotti.
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:1542-4766
1542-4774
DOI:10.1111/jeea.12007