Is there any difference between the obstetric and perinatal complications of pregnancy in patients with and without repeated implantation failure in fresh and frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles?

• Published in: Middle East Fertility Society Journal Vol. 27; no. 1; pp. 1 - 7
• Main Authors: Dashti, Saeideh, Mirzaei, Maryam, Eftekhar, Maryam, Mangoli, Esmat
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Springer 11-03-2022; SpringerOpen
• Subjects: Care and treatment; Embryo; Embryo transfer; IVF; Medical research; Medicine, Experimental; Obstetric complication; Obstetrics; Pregnancy; Pregnant women; Repeated implantation failure; Iran
• ISSN: 1110-5690; 2090-3251
• DOI: 10.1186/s43043-022-00097-4

Background Repeated implantation failure (RIF) is the main challenge in assisted reproduction; the present study aimed to compare the obstetric and perinatal outcomes between RIF and control patients who experienced a successful pregnancy after fresh embryo transfer (ET) or frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) cycles. Data were obtained from 1150 women experiencing embryo transfer(s), consisting of 720 fresh ET and 430 FET cycles, at the Research and Clinical Center for Infertility, Yazd, Iran. The 370 women, in total, reached chemical pregnancies and finally 321 cases in fresh ET (n=216) and FET (n=105) cycles with singleton deliveries divided into two groups of control and RIF according to the number of last implantation failures. Then, the rate of obstetric and prenatal complications was compared between two groups in fresh ET and FET cycles. Results The results showed a higher abortion rate in the RIF group compared to the control group in fresh and FET cycles. In the assessment of the data from the cases with singleton pregnancies in fresh and FET cycles, the results showed almost similar obstetric and perinatal complications in the patients of RIF and control groups. Although the rates of some complications like vaginal bleeding, PROM, preterm delivery, and NICU administration were higher in the RIF patients, these were not significant (P > 0.05). Conclusion There was some variation in the normal rates of obstetric and perinatal outcomes between RIF patients compared to control. But, it seems necessary to run studies on more patients to endorse this conclusion.