Cross-testing laser powder bed fusion production machines and powders: Variability in mechanical properties of heat-treated 316L stainless steel

• Published in: Materials & design Vol. 204; p. 109684
• Main Authors: Reijonen, Joni, Björkstrand, Roy, Riipinen, Tuomas, Que, Zaiqing, Metsä-Kortelainen, Sini, Salmi, Mika
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Elsevier Ltd 01-06-2021; Elsevier
• Subjects: Heat treatment; Laser powder bed fusion; Mechanical properties; Stainless steel; Variability; Mechanical properties; Laser powder bed fusion; Heat treatment; Stainless steel; Variability
• ISSN: 0264-1275; 1873-4197
• DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2021.109684

[Display omitted]
•Quantified machine-powder induced variability in mechanical properties of LPBF 316L.•HIP reduced variability in tensile strength, porosity and impact toughness.•Lower impact toughness compared to wrought 316L was mainly due to oxide inclusions.
Laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing is used for demanding applications in industries such as aerospace. However, machine-specific, optimized process conditions and parameters are required to assure consistent part quality. In addition, differences in supplied powder can cause variation in the mechanical properties of the final parts. In this paper, the variability in mechanical properties of 316L stainless steel produced with two different laser powder bed fusion machines from two different powder batches was studied by producing an identical set of tensile and impact toughness test specimens. The samples were subjected to stress-relieving, solution annealing and hot isostatic pressing to assess the effectiveness of standardized heat-treatments in reducing variation in the mechanical properties of the built parts. Porosity, microstructure, tensile properties, and impact toughness of the specimens were measured to study the effect of changing the material, machine, and heat treatment. The maximum differences observed between the studied machine-powder combinations were approximately 7% for tensile properties and approximately 20% for impact toughness. HIP reduced the variability in all other studied properties except elongation. All the specimens fulfil the minimum requirements set in ASTM F3184-16 for AM 316L.