Harvesting correlations from vacuum quantum fields in the presence of a reflecting boundary

• Published in: The journal of high energy physics Vol. 2023; no. 11; pp. 184 - 28
• Main Authors: Liu, Zhihong, Zhang, Jialin, Yu, Hongwei
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Berlin/Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg 24-11-2023; Springer Nature B.V; SpringerOpen
• Subjects: Boundary Quantum Field Theory; Classical and Quantum Gravitation; Correlation; Detectors; Elementary Particles; Energy gap; High energy physics; Physics; Physics and Astronomy; Quantum Dissipative Systems; Quantum Field Theories; Quantum Field Theory; Quantum Physics; Regular Article - Theoretical Physics; Relativity Theory; Scalars; Sensors; Separation; String Theory; Boundary Quantum Field Theory; Quantum Dissipative Systems
• ISSN: 1029-8479; 1029-8479
• DOI: 10.1007/JHEP11(2023)184

A
bstract
We explore correlations harvesting by two static detectors locally interacting with vacuum massless scalar fields in the presence of an infinite perfectly reflecting boundary. We study the phenomena of mutual information harvesting and entanglement harvesting for two detector-boundary alignments, i.e., parallel-to-boundary and orthogonal-to-boundary alignments. Our results show that the presence of the boundary generally inhibits mutual information harvesting relative to that in flat spacetime without any boundaries. In contrast, the boundary may play a doubled-edged role in entanglement harvesting, i.e., inhibiting entanglement harvesting in the near zone of the boundary while assisting it in the far zone of the boundary. Moreover, there exists an optimal detector energy gap difference between two nonidentical detectors that makes such detectors advantageous in correlations harvesting as long as the interdetector separation is large enough. The value of the optimal detector energy gap difference depends on both the interdetector separation and the detector-to-boundary distance. A comparison of the correlations harvesting in two different alignments shows that although correlations harvesting share qualitatively the same properties, they also display quantitative differences in that the detectors in orthogonal-to-boundary alignment always harvest comparatively more mutual information than the parallel-to-boundary ones, while they harvest comparatively more entanglement only near the boundary.