Consistency and reliability of the auditory vocal hallucination rating scale (AVHRS)

In sample 2, the Dutch Central Committee on Research involving Human Subjects did not allow inter-rater agreement assessments. [...]each of the eight interviewers of sample 2 rated five DVD-recorded interviews of VOPD patients. [...]a supposedly limitation of not performing factor analyses (like Had...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences Vol. 21; no. 3; pp. 305 - 310
Main Authors: Bartels-Velthuis, A. A., van de Willige, G., Jenner, J. A., Wiersma, D.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Cambridge, UK Cambridge University Press 01-09-2012
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:In sample 2, the Dutch Central Committee on Research involving Human Subjects did not allow inter-rater agreement assessments. [...]each of the eight interviewers of sample 2 rated five DVD-recorded interviews of VOPD patients. [...]a supposedly limitation of not performing factor analyses (like Haddock et al. 1999), would not add to better reliability of the scale, as in our opinion all topics of the AVHRS are important, making the outcome of the interview not reducible to a few major factors.
Bibliography:SourceType-Other Sources-1
content type line 63
ObjectType-Correspondence-1
ISSN:2045-7960
2045-7979
DOI:10.1017/S2045796012000108