Consistency and reliability of the auditory vocal hallucination rating scale (AVHRS)
In sample 2, the Dutch Central Committee on Research involving Human Subjects did not allow inter-rater agreement assessments. [...]each of the eight interviewers of sample 2 rated five DVD-recorded interviews of VOPD patients. [...]a supposedly limitation of not performing factor analyses (like Had...
Saved in:
Published in: | Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences Vol. 21; no. 3; pp. 305 - 310 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Cambridge, UK
Cambridge University Press
01-09-2012
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | In sample 2, the Dutch Central Committee on Research involving Human Subjects did not allow inter-rater agreement assessments. [...]each of the eight interviewers of sample 2 rated five DVD-recorded interviews of VOPD patients. [...]a supposedly limitation of not performing factor analyses (like Haddock et al. 1999), would not add to better reliability of the scale, as in our opinion all topics of the AVHRS are important, making the outcome of the interview not reducible to a few major factors. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | SourceType-Other Sources-1 content type line 63 ObjectType-Correspondence-1 |
ISSN: | 2045-7960 2045-7979 |
DOI: | 10.1017/S2045796012000108 |