6-month migration sufficient for evaluation of total knee replacements: a systematic review and meta-analysis

• Published in: Acta orthopaedica Vol. 94; pp. 577 - 587
• Main Authors: Puijk, Raymond, Puijk, Rowan H, Laende, Elise K, Dunbar, Michael J, Plevier, José W M, Nolte, Peter A, Pijls, Bart G C W
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Sweden Medical Journals Sweden 30-11-2023
• Subjects: Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Knee Prosthesis; Meta-analysis; Migration; Osteoarthritis, Knee - surgery; Prosthesis Design; Prosthesis Failure; Radiostereometric analysis; Radiostereometric Analysis - methods; Systematic review; Total Knee Replacement
• ISSN: 1745-3674; 1745-3682
• DOI: 10.2340/17453674.2023.24579

This updated meta-analysis evaluates the migration pattern of the tibial component of primary total knee replacements measured with radiostereometric analysis (RSA). We aimed to evaluate whether 6-month maximum total point motion (MTPM) values could be used instead of 1-year MTPM for RSA threshold testing and to present the pooled migration patterns for different implant designs that can be used as a benchmark.
The search included all published RSA studies on migration patterns of tibial components until 2023. Study groups were classified according to their prosthesis brand, fixation, and insert (PFI). Sub-analyses were performed to compare the mean tibial component migration patterns of different implant variables, stratified according to fixation.
96 studies (43 new studies), including 197 study groups and 4,706 knees, were included. Most migration occurred within the first 6 postoperative months (126 study groups: mean 0.58 mm, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.50-0.65), followed by minimal migration between 6 and 12 months (197 study groups: mean 0.04 mm, CI 0.03-0.06), irrespective of the fixation method used. Distinct migration patterns were observed among the different fixation methods. No differences were found in migration patterns among cemented components in any of the sub-group analyses conducted. For uncemented implants, trabecular metal surfaced components seemed to migrate less than porous-coated or uncoated components Conclusion: Based on the small difference between MTPM values at 6 months and 1 year, MTPM at 6 months could be used instead of MTPM at 1 year for RSA threshold testing. The pooled migration patterns can be used as benchmark for evaluation of new implants by defining fixation-specific RSA thresholds when combined with implant survival.